MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Thursday November 28, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
60 bytes added
, 03:00, 20 April 2009
Line 5,184: |
Line 5,184: |
| | | |
| And so we come to the end of the "number of" examples that we found on our agenda at this point in the text: | | And so we come to the end of the "number of" examples that we found on our agenda at this point in the text: |
| + | |
| + | '''NOF 4.5''' |
| | | |
| {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" <!--QUOTE--> | | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" <!--QUOTE--> |
| | | | | |
| <p>It is to be observed that:</p> | | <p>It is to be observed that:</p> |
− | | + | |- |
− | : <p>[!1!] = `1`.</p>
| + | | align="center" | <math>[\mathit{1}] ~=~ \mathfrak{1}.</math> |
− | | + | |- |
| + | | |
| <p>Boole was the first to show this connection between logic and probabilities. He was restricted, however, to absolute terms. I do not remember having seen any extension of probability to relatives, except the ordinary theory of ''expectation''.</p> | | <p>Boole was the first to show this connection between logic and probabilities. He was restricted, however, to absolute terms. I do not remember having seen any extension of probability to relatives, except the ordinary theory of ''expectation''.</p> |
| | | |
| <p>Our logical multiplication, then, satisfies the essential conditions of multiplication, has a unity, has a conception similar to that of admitted multiplications, and contains numerical multiplication as a case under it.</p> | | <p>Our logical multiplication, then, satisfies the essential conditions of multiplication, has a unity, has a conception similar to that of admitted multiplications, and contains numerical multiplication as a case under it.</p> |
| | | |
− | <p>C.S. Peirce, CP 3.76</p> | + | <p>(Peirce, CP 3.76).</p> |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |