Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Thursday November 07, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 5,184: Line 5,184:     
And so we come to the end of the "number of" examples that we found on our agenda at this point in the text:
 
And so we come to the end of the "number of" examples that we found on our agenda at this point in the text:
 +
 +
'''NOF 4.5'''
    
{| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" <!--QUOTE-->
 
{| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" <!--QUOTE-->
 
|
 
|
 
<p>It is to be observed that:</p>
 
<p>It is to be observed that:</p>
 
+
|-
: <p>[!1!] = `1`.</p>
+
| align="center" | <math>[\mathit{1}] ~=~ \mathfrak{1}.</math>
 
+
|-
 +
|
 
<p>Boole was the first to show this connection between logic and probabilities.  He was restricted, however, to absolute terms.  I do not remember having seen any extension of probability to relatives, except the ordinary theory of ''expectation''.</p>
 
<p>Boole was the first to show this connection between logic and probabilities.  He was restricted, however, to absolute terms.  I do not remember having seen any extension of probability to relatives, except the ordinary theory of ''expectation''.</p>
    
<p>Our logical multiplication, then, satisfies the essential conditions of multiplication, has a unity, has a conception similar to that of admitted multiplications, and contains numerical multiplication as a case under it.</p>
 
<p>Our logical multiplication, then, satisfies the essential conditions of multiplication, has a unity, has a conception similar to that of admitted multiplications, and contains numerical multiplication as a case under it.</p>
   −
<p>C.S. Peirce, CP 3.76</p>
+
<p>(Peirce, CP 3.76).</p>
 
|}
 
|}
  
12,080

edits

Navigation menu