| Line 4,841: |
Line 4,841: |
| | <math>\begin{array}{lllr} | | <math>\begin{array}{lllr} |
| | \mathrm{m} | | \mathrm{m} |
| − | & = & \mathrm{J} ~+\!\!,~ \mathrm{K} ~+\!\!,~ \mathrm{L} ~+\!\!,~ \mathrm{M} & = ~ \mathbf{1} | + | & = & |
| | + | \mathrm{J} ~+\!\!,~ \mathrm{K} ~+\!\!,~ \mathrm{L} ~+\!\!,~ \mathrm{M} \qquad = & |
| | + | \mathbf{1} |
| | \\[6pt] | | \\[6pt] |
| | \mathrm{f} | | \mathrm{f} |
| Line 4,861: |
Line 4,863: |
| | | | |
| | Now let's see if we can use this picture to make sense of the following statement: | | Now let's see if we can use this picture to make sense of the following statement: |
| | + | |
| | + | '''NOF 4.3''' |
| | | | |
| | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" <!--QUOTE--> | | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" <!--QUOTE--> |
| | | | | | |
| | <p>For instance, if our universe is perfect men, and there are as many teeth to a Frenchman (perfect understood) as there are to any one of the universe, then:</p> | | <p>For instance, if our universe is perfect men, and there are as many teeth to a Frenchman (perfect understood) as there are to any one of the universe, then:</p> |
| | + | |- |
| | + | | align="center" | <math>[\mathit{t}][\mathrm{f}] ~=~ [\mathit{t}\mathrm{f}]</math> |
| | + | |- |
| | + | | |
| | + | <p>holds arithmetically.</p> |
| | | | |
| − | : <p>[''t''][''f''] = [''tf'']</p>
| + | <p>(Peirce, CP 3.76).</p> |
| − | | |
| − | <p>holds arithmetically. (CP 3.76).</p>
| |
| | |} | | |} |
| | | | |
| − | In the lingua franca of statistics, Peirce is saying this: That if the population of Frenchmen is a "fair sample" of the general population with regard to dentition, then the morphic equation [''tf''] = [''t''][''f''], whose transpose gives [''t''] = [''tf'']/[''f''], is every bite as true as the defining equation in this circumstance, namely, [''t''] = [''tm'']/[''m'']. | + | In the language of statistics, Peirce is saying this: That if the population of Frenchmen is a ''fair sample'' of the general population with regard to dentition, then the morphic equation <math>[\mathit{t}\mathrm{f}] = [\mathit{t}][\mathrm{f}],\!</math> whose transpose gives <math>[\mathit{t}] = [\mathit{t}\mathrm{f}]/[\mathrm{f}],\!</math> is every bit as true as the defining equation in this circumstance, namely, <math>[\mathit{t}] = [\mathit{t}\mathrm{m}]/[\mathrm{m}].\!</math> |
| | | | |
| | ===Commentary Note 11.21=== | | ===Commentary Note 11.21=== |