MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday November 25, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
70 bytes added
, 14:30, 17 April 2009
Line 4,645: |
Line 4,645: |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
− | The "regular non-invertible addition" is signified by "+,", corresponding to what we'd call the inclusive disjunction of logical terms or the union of their extensions as sets. | + | The sign <math>^{\backprime\backprime} +\!\!, {}^{\prime\prime}</math> denotes what Peirce calls "the regular non-invertible addition", corresponding to the inclusive disjunction of logical terms or the union of their extensions as sets. |
| | | |
− | The "invertible addition" is signified in algebra by "+", corresponding to what we'd call the exclusive disjunction of logical terms or the symmetric difference of their sets, ignoring many details and nuances that are often important, of course. | + | The sign <math>^{\backprime\backprime} + ^{\prime\prime}</math> denotes what Peirce calls "the invertible addition", corresponding to the exclusive disjunction of logical terms or the symmetric difference of their extensions as sets. |
| | | |
| {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" <!--QUOTE--> | | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" <!--QUOTE--> |
| | | | | |
− | But the notation has other recommendations. The conception of ''taking together'' involved in these processes is strongly analogous to that of summation, the sum of 2 and 5, for example, being the number of a collection which consists of a collection of two and a collection of five. (CP 3.67). | + | <p>But the notation has other recommendations. The conception of ''taking together'' involved in these processes is strongly analogous to that of summation, the sum of 2 and 5, for example, being the number of a collection which consists of a collection of two and a collection of five.</p> |
| + | |
| + | <p>(Peirce, CP 3.67).</p> |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |