MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday November 25, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
11 bytes removed
, 19:12, 12 April 2009
Line 3,829: |
Line 3,829: |
| ===Commentary Note 11.7=== | | ===Commentary Note 11.7=== |
| | | |
− | We come now to the very special cases of 2-adic relations that are known as functions. It will serve a dual purpose on behalf of the exposition if we take the class of functions as a source of object examples to clarify the more abstruse concepts in the RIG material. | + | We come now to the very special cases of 2-adic relations that are known as ''functions''. It will serve a dual purpose on behalf of the present exposition if we take the class of functions as a source of object examples to clarify the more abstruse concepts in the RIG material. |
| | | |
| To begin, let's recall the definition of a ''local flag'': | | To begin, let's recall the definition of a ''local flag'': |
| | | |
− | : ''L''<sub>''x''.''j''</sub> = { (''x''<sub>1</sub>, …, ''x''<sub>''j''</sub>, …, ''x''<sub>''k''</sub>) ∈ ''L'' : ''x''<sub>''j''</sub> = ''x'' }.
| + | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" |
| + | | <math>L_{x \star j} = \{ (x_1, \ldots, x_j, \ldots, x_k) \in L : x_j = x \}.</math> |
| + | |} |
| | | |
| In the case of a 2-adic relation ''L'' ⊆ ''X''<sub>1</sub> × ''X''<sub>2</sub> = ''X'' × ''Y'', we can reap the benefits of a radical simplification in the definitions of the local flags. Also in this case, we tend to denote ''L''<sub>''u''.1</sub> by "''L''<sub>''u''.''X''</sub>" and ''L''<sub>''v''.2</sub> by "''L''<sub>''v''.''Y''</sub>". | | In the case of a 2-adic relation ''L'' ⊆ ''X''<sub>1</sub> × ''X''<sub>2</sub> = ''X'' × ''Y'', we can reap the benefits of a radical simplification in the definitions of the local flags. Also in this case, we tend to denote ''L''<sub>''u''.1</sub> by "''L''<sub>''u''.''X''</sub>" and ''L''<sub>''v''.2</sub> by "''L''<sub>''v''.''Y''</sub>". |