MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday November 25, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
899 bytes removed
, 03:22, 12 April 2009
Line 3,660: |
Line 3,660: |
| ===Commentary Note 11.3=== | | ===Commentary Note 11.3=== |
| | | |
− | Having spent a fair amount of time in earnest reflection on the issue, I cannot see a way to continue my interpretation of Peirce's 1870 LOR, to master the distance between his conventions of presentation and my present personal perspectives on relations, without introducing a few interpretive anachronisms and other artifacts in the process, and the only excuse that I can make for myself is that at least these will be novel sorts of anachronisms and artifacts in comparison with the ones that the reeder may alreedy have seen. A poor excuse, but all I have. The least that I can do, then, and I'm something of an expert on that, is to exposit my personal interpretive apparatus on a separate thread, where it will not distract too much from the intellectual canon, that is to opine, the "thinking panpipe" that we find in Peirce's 1870 LOR.
| + | The interpretation of Peirce's 1870 "Logic of Relatives" can be facilitated by introducing a few items of background material on relations in general, as regarded from a combinatorial point of view. |
− | | |
− | Ripped from the pages of my dissertation, then, I will lay out some samples of background material on "Relations In General", as spied from a combinatorial point of view, that I hope will serve in reeding Peirce's text, if we draw on it judiciously.
| |
| | | |
| ===Commentary Note 11.4=== | | ===Commentary Note 11.4=== |