MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday October 10, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to search
19 bytes added
, 22:04, 10 April 2009
Line 641: |
Line 641: |
| ===Commentary Note 8.1=== | | ===Commentary Note 8.1=== |
| | | |
− | To my way of thinking, CP 3.73 is one of the most remarkable passages in the history of logic. In this first pass over its deeper contents I won't be able to accord it much more than a superficial dusting off. | + | To my way of thinking, CP 3.73 is one of the most remarkable passages in the history of logic. In this first pass over its deeper contents I won't be able to accord it much more than a superficial dusting off. |
| | | |
| Let us imagine a concrete example that will serve in developing the uses of Peirce's notation. Entertain a discourse whose universe <math>X\!</math> will remind us a little of the cast of characters in Shakespeare's ''Othello''. | | Let us imagine a concrete example that will serve in developing the uses of Peirce's notation. Entertain a discourse whose universe <math>X\!</math> will remind us a little of the cast of characters in Shakespeare's ''Othello''. |
Line 649: |
Line 649: |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
− | The universe <math>X\!</math> is "that class of individuals ''about'' which alone the whole discourse is understood to run" but its marking out for special recognition as a universe of discourse in no way rules out the possibility that "discourse may run upon something which is not a subjective part of the universe; for instance, upon the qualities or collections of the individuals it contains" (CP 3.65). | + | The universe <math>X\!</math> is "that class of individuals ''about'' which alone the whole discourse is understood to run" but its marking out for special recognition as a universe of discourse in no way rules out the possibility that "discourse may run upon something which is not a subjective part of the universe; for instance, upon the qualities or collections of the individuals it contains" (CP 3.65). |
| | | |
| In order to provide ourselves with the convenience of abbreviated terms, while preserving Peirce's conventions about capitalization, we may use the alternate names <math>^{\backprime\backprime}\mathrm{u}^{\prime\prime}</math> for the universe <math>X\!</math> and <math>^{\backprime\backprime}\mathrm{Jeste}^{\prime\prime}</math> for the character <math>\mathrm{Clown}.\!</math> This permits the above description of the universe of discourse to be rewritten in the following fashion: | | In order to provide ourselves with the convenience of abbreviated terms, while preserving Peirce's conventions about capitalization, we may use the alternate names <math>^{\backprime\backprime}\mathrm{u}^{\prime\prime}</math> for the universe <math>X\!</math> and <math>^{\backprime\backprime}\mathrm{Jeste}^{\prime\prime}</math> for the character <math>\mathrm{Clown}.\!</math> This permits the above description of the universe of discourse to be rewritten in the following fashion: |
Line 662: |
Line 662: |
| | | | | |
| <math>\begin{array}{*{15}{c}} | | <math>\begin{array}{*{15}{c}} |
− | 1 | + | \mathbf{1} |
| & = & \mathrm{B} | | & = & \mathrm{B} |
| & +\!\!, & \mathrm{C} | | & +\!\!, & \mathrm{C} |