Changes

<p>Now a relative formed by a comma of course receives its subjacent numbers like any relative, but the question is, What are to be the implied subjacent numbers for these implied correlates?</p>

<p>Now a relative formed by a comma of course receives its subjacent numbers like any relative, but the question is, What are to be the implied subjacent numbers for these implied correlates?</p>

<p>Any term may be regarded as having an infinite number of factors, those at the end being 'ones', thus:</p>

<p>Any term may be regarded as having an infinite number of factors, those at the end being ''ones'', thus:</p>

 

: <p>'l','s'w = 'l','s'w,!1!,!1!,!1!,!1!,!1!,!1!,!1!, etc.</p>

 

<math>\mathit{l},\!\mathit{s}\mathrm{w} ~=~ \mathit{l},\!\mathit{s}\mathit{w},\!\mathit{1},\!\mathit{1},\!\mathit{1},\!\mathit{1},\!\mathit{1},\!\mathit{1},\!\mathit{1}, ~\text{etc.}</math>

<p>A subjacent number may therefore be as great as we please.</p>

<p>A subjacent number may therefore be as great as we please.</p>

<p>But all these 'ones' denote the same identical individual denoted by w;  what then can be the subjacent numbers to be applied to 's', for instance, on account of its infinite "that is"'s?  What numbers can separate it from being identical with w?  There are only two.  The first is 'zero', which plainly neutralizes a comma completely, since</p>

<p>But all these ''ones'' denote the same identical individual denoted by w;  what then can be the subjacent numbers to be applied to 's', for instance, on account of its infinite "that is"'s?  What numbers can separate it from being identical with w?  There are only two.  The first is ''zero'', which plainly neutralizes a comma completely, since</p>

: <p>'s',_0 w = 's'w</p>

: <p>'s',_0 w = 's'w</p>