Changes

<p>In order to answer this objection we must revert to that distinction between ''thing'', ''image'', and ''form'' established in the lecture upon the definition of logic.  A representation is anything which may be regarded as standing for something else.  Matter or thing is that for which a representation might stand prescinded from all that could constitute a relation with any representation.  A form is the relation between a representation and thing prescinded from both representation and thing.  An image is a representation prescinded from thing and form.</p>

<p>In order to answer this objection we must revert to that distinction between ''thing'', ''image'', and ''form'' established in the lecture upon the definition of logic.  A representation is anything which may be regarded as standing for something else.  Matter or thing is that for which a representation might stand prescinded from all that could constitute a relation with any representation.  A form is the relation between a representation and thing prescinded from both representation and thing.  An image is a representation prescinded from thing and form.</p>

<p>Derived directly from this abstractest triad was another less abstract.  This is Object—Equivalent-Representation—Logos.  The ''object'' is a thing corresponding to a representation regarded as actual.  The equivalent representation is a representation in any language equivalent to a representation regarded as actual.  A Logos is a form constituting the relation between an object and a representation regarded as actual.</p>

<p>Derived directly from this abstractest triad was another less abstract.  This is Object&mdash;Equivalent Representation&mdash;Logos.  The ''object'' is a thing corresponding to a representation regarded as actual.  The equivalent representation is a representation in any language equivalent to a representation regarded as actual.  A Logos is a form constituting the relation between an object and a representation regarded as actual.</p>

<p>Every symbol may be said in three different senses to be determined by its ''object'', its ''equivalent representation'', and its ''logos''.  It stands for its ''object'', it translates its ''equivalent representation'', it realizes its ''logos''. (Peirce 1865, "Harvard Lecture 10. Grounds of Induction", CE 1, 274).</p>

<p>Every symbol may be said in three different senses to be determined by its ''object'', its ''equivalent representation'', and its ''logos''.  It stands for its ''object'', it translates its ''equivalent representation'', it realizes its ''logos''.</p>

 

<p>(Peirce 1865, Harvard Lecture 10 : Grounds of Induction, CE 1, 274).</p>

|}

|}