MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Sunday April 06, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to search
111 bytes added
, 04:10, 30 March 2009
Line 192:
Line 192:
In view of the analogical symmetries that the disjunctive term shares with the conjunctive case, I think that we can run through this example in fairly short order. We have an aggregation over four terms:
In view of the analogical symmetries that the disjunctive term shares with the conjunctive case, I think that we can run through this example in fairly short order. We have an aggregation over four terms:
−
: ''s''<sub>1</sub> = ''neat''
+
{| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%"
−
: ''s''<sub>2</sub> = ''swine''
+
|
−
: ''s''<sub>3</sub> = ''sheep''
+
<math>\begin{array}{lll}
−
: ''s''<sub>4</sub> = ''deer''
+
s_1 & = & \operatorname{neat}
+
\\
+
s_2 & = & \operatorname{swine}
+
\\
+
s_3 & = & \operatorname{sheep}
+
\\
+
s_4 & = & \operatorname{deer}
+
\end{array}</math>
+
|}
−
Suppose that ''u'' is the logical disjunction of these four terms:
+
Suppose that <math>u\!</math> is the logical disjunction of these four terms:
: ''u'' = ((''s''<sub>1</sub>)(''s''<sub>2</sub>)(''s''<sub>3</sub>)(''s''<sub>4</sub>)).
: ''u'' = ((''s''<sub>1</sub>)(''s''<sub>2</sub>)(''s''<sub>3</sub>)(''s''<sub>4</sub>)).