MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Saturday May 04, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
41 bytes removed
, 17:35, 29 March 2009
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{DISPLAYTITLE:Information = Comprehension × Extension}} | | {{DISPLAYTITLE:Information = Comprehension × Extension}} |
| | | |
− | ==Information, Comprehension, Extension==
| + | Another angle from which to approach the incidence of [[sign]]s and [[inquiry]] is by way of [[Charles Sanders Peirce|Peirce]]'s "[[laws of information]]" — yes, that's just what he called it, from the time of his lectures on the "Logic of Science" at Harvard University (1865) and the Lowell Institute (1866). |
− | | |
− | Another angle from which to approach the incidence of [[sign]]s and [[inquiry]] is by way of [[Charles Sanders Peirce|Peirce]]'s "[[theory of information]]" — yes, that's just what he called it, from the time of his lectures on the "Logic of Science" at Harvard University (1865) and the Lowell Institute (1866). | |
| | | |
| When it comes to the supposed reciprocity between [[extension (logic)|extension]]s and [[intension (logic)|intension]]s, Peirce, of course, has another idea, and I would say a better idea, in part, because it forms the occasion for him to bring in his new-fangled notion of "[[information]]" to mediate the otherwise static dualism between the other two. The development of this novel idea brings Peirce to enunciate this formula: | | When it comes to the supposed reciprocity between [[extension (logic)|extension]]s and [[intension (logic)|intension]]s, Peirce, of course, has another idea, and I would say a better idea, in part, because it forms the occasion for him to bring in his new-fangled notion of "[[information]]" to mediate the otherwise static dualism between the other two. The development of this novel idea brings Peirce to enunciate this formula: |