MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday October 24, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to search
78 bytes added
, 18:56, 17 March 2009
| Line 2,486: |
Line 2,486: |
| | The Transition Relation segment of the propositional program for <math>\operatorname{Stunt}(2)</math> consists of sixteen implication statements with complex antecedents and consequents. Taken together, these give propositional expression to the TM Figure and Table that were given at the outset. | | The Transition Relation segment of the propositional program for <math>\operatorname{Stunt}(2)</math> consists of sixteen implication statements with complex antecedents and consequents. Taken together, these give propositional expression to the TM Figure and Table that were given at the outset. |
| | | | |
| − | <pre>
| |
| | Just by way of a single example, consider the clause: | | Just by way of a single example, consider the clause: |
| | | | |
| − | ( p0_q0 p0_r1 p0_r1_s1 ( p1_q1 p1_r2 p1_r1_s1 ))
| + | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" width="90%" |
| | + | | <math>\texttt{(~p0\_q0~~p0\_r1~~p0\_r1\_s1~~(~p1\_q1~~p1\_r2~~p1\_r1\_s1~))}</math> |
| | + | |} |
| | | | |
| | This complex implication statement can be read to say: | | This complex implication statement can be read to say: |
| | | | |
| | + | <pre> |
| | IF: | | IF: |
| | | | |