Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Tuesday September 09, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 532: Line 532:  
|}
 
|}
   −
<pre>
+
Maintaining a strict analogy with ordinary difference calculus would perhaps have us write <math>\operatorname{D}G_j = \operatorname{E}G_j - G_j,</math> but the sum and difference operations are the same thing in boolean arithmetic. It is more often natural in the logical context to consider an initial proposition <math>q,\!</math> then to compute the enlargement <math>\operatorname{E}q,</math> and finally to determine the difference <math>\operatorname{D}q = q + \operatorname{E}q,</math> so we let the variant order of terms reflect this sequence of considerations.
DG_1  G_1 <u, v> +  EG_1 <u, v, du, dv>
     −
      =  G_1 <u, v>  +  G_1 <u + du, v + dv>
+
Given these general considerations about the operators <math>\operatorname{E}</math> and <math>\operatorname{D},</math> let's return to particular cases, and carry out the first order analysis of the transformation <math>F(u, v) ~=~ ( ~\underline{((}~ u ~\underline{)(}~ v ~\underline{))}~ , ~\underline{((}~ u ~,~ v ~\underline{))}~ ).</math>
 
  −
DG_2  =  G_2 <u, v>  +  EG_2 <u, v, du, dv>
  −
 
  −
      =  G_2 <u, v>  +  G_2 <u + du, v + dv>
  −
 
  −
Maintaining a strict analogy with ordinary difference calculus
  −
would perhaps have us write DG_j = EG_j - G_j, but the sum and
  −
difference operations are the same thing in boolean arithmetic.
  −
It is more often natural in the logical context to consider an
  −
initial proposition q, then to compute the enlargement Eq, and
  −
finally to determine the difference Dq = q + Eq, so we let the
  −
variant order of terms reflect this sequence of considerations.
  −
 
  −
Given these general considerations about the operators E and D,
  −
let's return to particular cases, and carry out the first order
  −
analysis of the transformation F<u, v= <((u)(v)), ((u, v))>.
  −
</pre>
      
==Note 11==
 
==Note 11==
12,089

edits

Navigation menu