| Line 1,691: | Line 1,691: | 
|  | |} |  | |} | 
|  |  |  |  | 
| − | A few of the many different expressions for this concept are recorded in Definition 11. | + | A few of the many different expressions for this concept are recorded in Definition 11. | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  | <br> |  | <br> | 
| Line 1,767: | Line 1,767: | 
|  | To define the ''equiference'' of signs in terms of their denotations, one says that ''<math>x\!</math> is equiferent to <math>y\!</math> under <math>L,\!</math>'' and writes <math>x ~\overset{L}{=}~ y,\!</math> to mean that <math>\operatorname{Den}(L, x) = \operatorname{Den}(L, y).</math>  Taken in extension, this notion of a relation between signs induces an ''equiference relation'' on the syntactic domain. |  | To define the ''equiference'' of signs in terms of their denotations, one says that ''<math>x\!</math> is equiferent to <math>y\!</math> under <math>L,\!</math>'' and writes <math>x ~\overset{L}{=}~ y,\!</math> to mean that <math>\operatorname{Den}(L, x) = \operatorname{Den}(L, y).</math>  Taken in extension, this notion of a relation between signs induces an ''equiference relation'' on the syntactic domain. | 
|  |  |  |  | 
| − | <pre>
 | + | For each sign relation <math>L,\!</math> this yields a binary relation <math>\operatorname{Der}(L) \subseteq S \times I</math> that is defined as follows: | 
| − | For each sign relation R, this yields a binary relation Der(R)c SxI that is defined as follows: |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
| − | Der(R) = DerR  = {<x, y> C SxI : Den(R, x) = Den(R, y)}. | + | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" width="90%" | 
|  | + | | <math>\operatorname{Der}(L) ~=~ Der^L ~=~ \{ (x, y) \in S \times I ~:~ \operatorname{Den}(L, x) = \operatorname{Den}(L, y) \}.</math> | 
|  | + | |} | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  | These definitions and notations are recorded in the following display. |  | These definitions and notations are recorded in the following display. | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  | + | <br> | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | <pre> | 
|  | Definition 13 |  | Definition 13 | 
|  |  |  |  | 
| Line 1,787: | Line 1,791: | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  | D13d.	{<x,y> C SxI : Den(R, x) = Den(R, y)} |  | D13d.	{<x,y> C SxI : Den(R, x) = Den(R, y)} | 
|  | + | </pre> | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  | + | <br> | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | <pre> | 
|  | The relation Der(R) is defined and the notation "x =R y" is meaningful in every situation where Den(-,-) makes sense, but it remains to check whether this relation enjoys the properties of an equivalence relation. |  | The relation Der(R) is defined and the notation "x =R y" is meaningful in every situation where Den(-,-) makes sense, but it remains to check whether this relation enjoys the properties of an equivalence relation. | 
|  |  |  |  |