MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday November 25, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
291 bytes added
, 19:04, 12 January 2009
Line 2,892: |
Line 2,892: |
| </ol> | | </ol> |
| | | |
− | <pre>
| + | A ''proposition about things in the universe'', more simply, a ''proposition'', is the same thing as an indicator function, that is, a function of the form <math>f : X \to \underline\mathbb{B}.</math> The convenience of this seemingly redundant usage is that it permits one to refer to an indicator function without having to specify right away, as a part of its only available designation, exactly what set it indicates, even though a proposition is always an indicator function of some subset of the universe, and even though one probably or eventually wants to know which one. |
− | A "proposition about things in the universe", for short, a "proposition", is the same thing as an indicator function, that is, a function of the form f : U �> B. The convenience of this seemingly redundant usage is that it permits one to refer to an indicator function without having to specify right away, as a part of its only available designation, exactly what set it indicates, even though a proposition is always an indicator function of some subset of the universe, and even though one probably or eventually wants to know which one. | + | |
| According to the stated understandings, a proposition is a function that indicates a set, in the sense that a function associates values with the elements of a domain, some which values can be interpreted to mark out for special consideration a subset of that domain. The way in which an indicator function is imagined to "indicate" a set can be expressed in terms of the following concepts. | | According to the stated understandings, a proposition is a function that indicates a set, in the sense that a function associates values with the elements of a domain, some which values can be interpreted to mark out for special consideration a subset of that domain. The way in which an indicator function is imagined to "indicate" a set can be expressed in terms of the following concepts. |
| | | |
− | The "fiber" of a codomain element y in Y under a function f : X -> Y is the subset of the domain X that is mapped onto y, in short, it is f^(-1)(y) c X. | + | The ''fiber'' of a codomain element <math>y \in Y\!</math> under a function <math>f : X \to Y</math> is the subset of the domain <math>X\!</math> that is mapped onto <math>y,\!</math> in short, it is <math>f^{-1} (y) \subseteq X.</math> |
| | | |
− | In other language that is often used, the fiber of y under f is called the "antecedent set", the "inverse image", the "level set", or the "pre-image" of y under f. All of these equivalent concepts are defined as follows: | + | In other language that is often used, the fiber of <math>y\!</math> under <math>f\!</math> is called the ''antecedent set'', the ''inverse image'', the ''level set'', or the ''pre-image'' of <math>y\!</math> under <math>f.\!</math> All of these equivalent concepts are defined as follows: |
| | | |
− | Fiber of y under f = f^(-1)(y) = {x in X : f(x) = y}. | + | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" width="90%" |
| + | | <math>\operatorname{Fiber~of}~ y ~\operatorname{under}~ f \ = \ f^{-1} (y) \ = \ \{ x \in X : f(x) = y \}.</math> |
| + | |} |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| In the special case where f is the indicator function f_Q of the set Q c X, the fiber of %1% under f_Q is just the set Q back again: | | In the special case where f is the indicator function f_Q of the set Q c X, the fiber of %1% under f_Q is just the set Q back again: |
| | | |