3,209
edits
Changes
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Wednesday April 09, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to searchDirectory:Logic Museum/sandbox (view source)
Revision as of 13:02, 31 December 2008
, 13:02, 31 December 2008no edit summary
Line 1:
Line 1:
−== ON THE DEFINITION OF 'TERM' ==
+== ON THE DIVISION OF THE NON-COMPLEX TERM ==
−
−{| border=1 cellpadding=10"
−!valign = top width=45%|
−!valign = top width=55%|
{| border=1 cellpadding=10"
{| border=1 cellpadding=10"
!valign = top width=45%|Latin
!valign = top width=45%|Latin
!valign = top width=55%|English
!valign = top width=55%|English
|- valign = top
|- valign = top
−|| <b>Pars I CAP. 1. DE DEFINITIONE TERMINI ET EIUS DIVISIONE IN GENERALI</b>
+|| <a name = "c1"><b>Pars I CAP. 1. DE DEFINITIONE TERMINI ET EIUS DIVISIONE IN GENERALI</b>
|| ON THE DEFINITION OF 'TERM', AND OF THE DIVISION OF IT IN GENERAL
|| ON THE DEFINITION OF 'TERM', AND OF THE DIVISION OF IT IN GENERAL
Line 58:
Line 57:
|| In another way 'sign' is taken for that which causes something come into cognition and is suited to stand for it, or to be added to such a thing in a proposition. Of such a sort are <i>syncategoremata</i> and verbs and those parts of speech which do not have a definite signification – or which is suited to be put together out of such things, as an expression is. And taking the word 'sign' in this way, an utterance is a natural sign of nothing.
|| In another way 'sign' is taken for that which causes something come into cognition and is suited to stand for it, or to be added to such a thing in a proposition. Of such a sort are <i>syncategoremata</i> and verbs and those parts of speech which do not have a definite signification – or which is suited to be put together out of such things, as an expression is. And taking the word 'sign' in this way, an utterance is a natural sign of nothing.
−|- valign = top
−|| <a name = "c3"><b>CAP. 3. DE DIVISIONE TERMINI INCOMPLEXI</b>
|| <a name = "c3"><b>CAP. 3. DE DIVISIONE TERMINI INCOMPLEXI</b>
|| ON THE DIVISION OF THE NON-COMPLEX TERM
|| ON THE DIVISION OF THE NON-COMPLEX TERM
Line 278:
Line 272:
|| (13) Et haec de divisionibus terminorum sufficiant. Aliqua autem in praedictis omissa inferius supplebuntur.
|| (13) Et haec de divisionibus terminorum sufficiant. Aliqua autem in praedictis omissa inferius supplebuntur.
|| (13) Let these things suffice for the divisions of terms. Now, some things omitted in the above will be filled in below.
|| (13) Let these things suffice for the divisions of terms. Now, some things omitted in the above will be filled in below.
+
+|}
