Changes

Line 1,935: Line 1,935:  
In short, an UR-planted PARC has a single PARC as its only attachment, and since this attachment is prevented from being a blank or a paint, the single attachment at its root has to be another sort of structure, that which we call a ''lobe''.
 
In short, an UR-planted PARC has a single PARC as its only attachment, and since this attachment is prevented from being a blank or a paint, the single attachment at its root has to be another sort of structure, that which we call a ''lobe''.
   −
<pre>
+
To express the description of a PARC in terms of its nodes, each node can be specified in the fashion of a functional expression, letting a citation of the generic function name "<math>\operatorname{Node}</math>" be followed by a list of arguments that enumerates the attachments of the node in question, and letting a citation of the generic function name "<math>\operatorname{Lobe}</math>" be followed by a list of arguments that details the accoutrements of the lobe in question. Thus, one can write expressions of the following forms:
To express the description of a PARC in terms of its nodes, each node
  −
can be specified in the fashion of a functional expression, letting a
  −
citation of the generic function name "Node" be followed by a list of
  −
arguments that enumerates the attachments of the node in question, and
  −
letting a citation of the generic function name "Lobe" be followed by a
  −
list of arguments that details the accoutrements of the lobe in question.
  −
Thus, one can write expressions of the following forms:
     −
1. Node^0         = Node()
+
{| align="center" cellpadding="8" width="90%"
 
+
| 1.
                  = a node with no attachments.
+
| <math>\operatorname{Node}^0</math>
 
+
| <math>=\!</math>
    Node^k_j  C_j = Node(C_1, ..., C_k)
+
| <math>\operatorname{Node}()</math>
 
+
|-
                  = a node with the attachments C_1, ..., C_k.
+
| &nbsp;
 
+
| &nbsp;
2. Lobe^0         = Lobe()
+
| <math>=\!</math>
 
+
| a node with no attachments.
                  = a lobe with no accoutrements.
+
|-
 
+
| &nbsp;
    Lobe^k_j  C_j = Lobe(C_1, ..., C_k)
+
| <math>\operatorname{Node}_{j=1}^k C_j</math>
 
+
| <math>=\!</math>
                  = a lobe with the accoutrements C_1, ..., C_k.
+
| <math>\operatorname{Node} (C_1, \ldots, C_k)</math>
 +
|-
 +
| &nbsp;
 +
| &nbsp;
 +
| <math>=\!</math>
 +
| a node with the attachments <math>C_1, \ldots, C_k.</math>
 +
|-
 +
| 2.
 +
| <math>\operatorname{Lobe}^0</math>
 +
| <math>=\!</math>
 +
| <math>\operatorname{Lobe}()</math>
 +
|-
 +
| &nbsp;
 +
| &nbsp;
 +
| <math>=\!</math>
 +
| a lobe with no accoutrements.
 +
|-
 +
| &nbsp;
 +
| <math>\operatorname{Lobe}_{j=1}^k C_j</math>
 +
| <math>=\!</math>
 +
| <math>\operatorname{Lobe} (C_1, \ldots, C_k)</math>
 +
|-
 +
| &nbsp;
 +
| &nbsp;
 +
| <math>=\!</math>
 +
| a lobe with the accoutrements <math>C_1, \ldots, C_k.</math>
 +
|}
    +
<pre>
 
Working from a structural description of the cactus language,
 
Working from a structural description of the cactus language,
 
or any suitable formal grammar for !C!(!P!), it is possible to
 
or any suitable formal grammar for !C!(!P!), it is possible to
12,089

edits