Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Wednesday May 29, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1,423: Line 1,423:  
====1.3.5.  Discussion of Formalization : Specific Objects====
 
====1.3.5.  Discussion of Formalization : Specific Objects====
   −
<blockquote>
+
{| align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="90%"
"Knowledge" is a referring back:  in its essence a regressus in infinitum.  That which comes to a standstill (at a supposed causa prima, at something unconditioned, etc.) is laziness, weariness &mdash; (Nietzsche, The Will to Power S575, 309).
+
|
</blockquote>
+
"Knowledge" is a referring back:  in its essence a regressus in infinitum.  That which comes to a standstill (at a supposed causa prima, at something unconditioned, etc.) is laziness, weariness &mdash;
 +
|-
 +
| align="right" | Nietzsche, ''The Will to Power'' S575, 309
 +
|}
    
With this preamble, I return to develop my own account of formalization, with special attention to the kind of step that leads from the inchoate chaos of casual discourse to a well-founded discussion of formal models.  A formalization step, of the incipient kind being considered here, has the peculiar property that one can say with some definiteness where it ends, since it leads precisely to a well-defined formal model, but not with any definiteness where it begins.  Any attempt to trace the steps of formalization backward toward their ultimate beginnings can lead to an interminable multiplicity of open-ended explorations.  In view of these circumstances, let me limit my attention to the frame of the present inquiry and try to sum up what brings me to this point.
 
With this preamble, I return to develop my own account of formalization, with special attention to the kind of step that leads from the inchoate chaos of casual discourse to a well-founded discussion of formal models.  A formalization step, of the incipient kind being considered here, has the peculiar property that one can say with some definiteness where it ends, since it leads precisely to a well-defined formal model, but not with any definiteness where it begins.  Any attempt to trace the steps of formalization backward toward their ultimate beginnings can lead to an interminable multiplicity of open-ended explorations.  In view of these circumstances, let me limit my attention to the frame of the present inquiry and try to sum up what brings me to this point.
12,080

edits

Navigation menu