3,209
edits
Changes
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Sunday April 28, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to searchDirectory:The Wikipedia Point of View/HeadleyDown (view source)
Revision as of 18:40, 14 December 2008
, 18:40, 14 December 2008→References
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=1282&target=KrishnaVindaloo KrishnaVindaloo] 28 April 2006 - 5 December 2006 (1282 contributions)
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=1282&target=KrishnaVindaloo KrishnaVindaloo] 28 April 2006 - 5 December 2006 (1282 contributions)
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Addisababa Addisababa] 25 June 2007 - 3 July 2007 (9 contributions)
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Addisababa Addisababa] 25 June 2007 - 3 July 2007 (9 contributions)
== Alan Barnet ==
It has been asserted by others that AlanBarnett is HeadleyDown. I would not like to call that, since at least some of the motivation for the assertion seems to be that he is pushing the scientific mainstream view of NLP in that article. Previously the article was under mediation; maybe it needs to be again. My understanding is that HeadleyDown was less calm and less polite than AlanBarnett. I have no personal knowledge of HeadleyDown, though. There is abundant evidence of conflict of interest in the pro-NLP camp, and they definitely dominate editing of that article. Guy (Help!) 10:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive175#NLP_update_-_Some_COI_issues_and_reluctance_of_some_editors_to_get_along_.28and_some_positive_points.29]
Having compared the version from December 1 with the current version, it seems to me very much as if Comaze and a few others are promoting rather than documenting the concept. The article becomes more promotional with each batch of edits, and the fundamental fact that NLP is essentially a cult with no scientific validity is more and more obscured. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 15:31, 16 December 2006 (UTC) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=94711304]
You are reading far more into it than is warranted. NLP is a cultic system (per numerous sources), but that does not imply that anyone who is involved with it is a cultist or cult victim. The entire nest of NLP articles exists primarily to promote the cult of NLP, and that is a pressing problem. Several involved editors have a vested interest in promoting it, that is a pressing problem, too. Guy (Help!) 14:45, 20 December 2006 (UTC) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JzG/Archive-Jan-2007]
== References ==
== References ==
