Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Saturday November 23, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search

Directory talk:Jon Awbrey/Projects/Notes And Queries (view source)

Revision as of 14:40, 7 November 2008

1,936 bytes removed ,  14:40, 7 November 2008
→‎DET. Determination
Line 5: Line 5:     
===DET.  Determination===
 
===DET.  Determination===
 +
 +
====DET.  Note 1====
    
<pre>
 
<pre>
−
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
  −
  −
DET.  Note 1
  −
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
  −
   
| Now that I have proved sufficiently that everything
 
| Now that I have proved sufficiently that everything
 
| comes to pass according to determinate reasons, there
 
| comes to pass according to determinate reasons, there
Line 49: Line 45:  
| 1875-1890.  Routledge 1951.  Open Court 1985.
 
| 1875-1890.  Routledge 1951.  Open Court 1985.
 
| Paragraph 360, page 341.
 
| Paragraph 360, page 341.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 2====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 2
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| Earlier this century in 'The Open Universe: An Argument for Indeterminism',
 
| Earlier this century in 'The Open Universe: An Argument for Indeterminism',
 
| Karl Popper wrote, "Common sense inclines, on the one hand, to assert that
 
| Karl Popper wrote, "Common sense inclines, on the one hand, to assert that
Line 70: Line 64:  
| The Free Press, New York, NY, 1997, p. 1.  Originally published as:
 
| The Free Press, New York, NY, 1997, p. 1.  Originally published as:
 
|'La Fin des Certitudes', Éditions Odile Jacob, 1996.
 
|'La Fin des Certitudes', Éditions Odile Jacob, 1996.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 3====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 3
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| Of triadic Being the multitude of forms
 
| Of triadic Being the multitude of forms
 
| is so terrific that I have usually shrunk
 
| is so terrific that I have usually shrunk
Line 101: Line 93:  
|
 
|
 
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 6.347
 
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 6.347
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 4====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 4
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| That whatever action is brute, unintelligent, and unconcerned
 
| That whatever action is brute, unintelligent, and unconcerned
 
| with the result of it is purely dyadic is either demonstrable
 
| with the result of it is purely dyadic is either demonstrable
Line 126: Line 116:  
|
 
|
 
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 6.332
 
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 6.332
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 5====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 5
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| Accurate writers have apparently made a distinction
 
| Accurate writers have apparently made a distinction
 
| between the 'definite' and the 'determinate'.  A subject
 
| between the 'definite' and the 'determinate'.  A subject
Line 166: Line 154:  
|
 
|
 
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 5.447
 
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 5.447
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 6====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 6
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| Perhaps a more scientific pair of definitions would be
 
| Perhaps a more scientific pair of definitions would be
 
| that anything is 'general' in so far as the principle of
 
| that anything is 'general' in so far as the principle of
Line 192: Line 178:  
|
 
|
 
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 5.448
 
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 5.448
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 7====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 7
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| These remarks require supplementation.  Determination, in general, is not
 
| These remarks require supplementation.  Determination, in general, is not
 
| defined at all;  and the attempt at defining the determination of a subject
 
| defined at all;  and the attempt at defining the determination of a subject
Line 231: Line 215:  
|
 
|
 
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 5.448, note 1
 
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 5.448, note 1
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 8====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 8
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| Another advantage of this definition is that it saves us
 
| Another advantage of this definition is that it saves us
 
| from the blunder of thinking that a sign is indeterminate
 
| from the blunder of thinking that a sign is indeterminate
Line 250: Line 232:  
|
 
|
 
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 5.448, note 1
 
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 5.448, note 1
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 9====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 9
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| At the same time, it is tolerably evident that the definition,
 
| At the same time, it is tolerably evident that the definition,
 
| as it stands, is not sufficiently explicit, and further, that
 
| as it stands, is not sufficiently explicit, and further, that
Line 278: Line 258:  
|
 
|
 
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 5.448, note 1
 
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 5.448, note 1
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 10====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 10
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| The October remarks [i.e. those in the above paper] made the
 
| The October remarks [i.e. those in the above paper] made the
 
| proper distinction between the two kinds of indeterminacy, viz.:
 
| proper distinction between the two kinds of indeterminacy, viz.:
Line 325: Line 303:  
|
 
|
 
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 5.448, note 1
 
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 5.448, note 1
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 11====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 11
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| Concepts, or terms, are, in logic, conceived to have
 
| Concepts, or terms, are, in logic, conceived to have
 
| 'subjective parts', being the narrower terms into which
 
| 'subjective parts', being the narrower terms into which
Line 396: Line 372:  
|
 
|
 
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 2.364
 
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 2.364
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 12====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 12
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| Determine.
 
| Determine.
 
|
 
|
Line 424: Line 398:  
| Joseph T. Shipley, 'Dictionary of Word Origins',
 
| Joseph T. Shipley, 'Dictionary of Word Origins',
 
| Rowman & Allanheld, Totowa, NJ, 1967, 1985.
 
| Rowman & Allanheld, Totowa, NJ, 1967, 1985.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 13====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 13
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| To determine means to make a circumstance different from what
 
| To determine means to make a circumstance different from what
 
| it might have been otherwise.  For example, a drop of rain
 
| it might have been otherwise.  For example, a drop of rain
Line 444: Line 416:  
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
 
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
 
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
 
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 14====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 14
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| Taking it for granted, then, that the inner and outer worlds are
 
| Taking it for granted, then, that the inner and outer worlds are
 
| superposed throughout, without possibility of separation, let us
 
| superposed throughout, without possibility of separation, let us
Line 493: Line 463:  
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
 
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
 
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
 
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 15====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 15
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| But not to follow this subject too far, we have
 
| But not to follow this subject too far, we have
 
| now established three species of representations:
 
| now established three species of representations:
Line 579: Line 547:  
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
 
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
 
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
 
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 16====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 16
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| The consideration of this imperfect datum leads us to make
 
| The consideration of this imperfect datum leads us to make
 
| a fundamental observation;  namely, that the problem how we
 
| a fundamental observation;  namely, that the problem how we
Line 625: Line 591:  
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
 
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
 
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
 
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 17====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 17
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| There is a large class of reasonings which are neither deductive nor inductive.
 
| There is a large class of reasonings which are neither deductive nor inductive.
 
| I mean the inference of a cause from its effect or reasoning to a physical hypothesis.
 
| I mean the inference of a cause from its effect or reasoning to a physical hypothesis.
Line 652: Line 616:  
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
 
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
 
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
 
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 18====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 18
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| We come now to the question, what is the 'rationale' of these three kinds
 
| We come now to the question, what is the 'rationale' of these three kinds
 
| of reasoning.  And first let us understand precisely what we intend by this.
 
| of reasoning.  And first let us understand precisely what we intend by this.
Line 690: Line 652:  
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
 
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
 
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
 
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 19====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 19
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| Now all symbolization is of three objects, at once;  the first is a possible thing,
 
| Now all symbolization is of three objects, at once;  the first is a possible thing,
 
| the second is a possible form, the third is a possible symbol.  It will be objected
 
| the second is a possible form, the third is a possible symbol.  It will be objected
Line 736: Line 696:  
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
 
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
 
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
 
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 20====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 20
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| Is there any knowledge 'à priori'?  All our thought begins with
 
| Is there any knowledge 'à priori'?  All our thought begins with
 
| experience, the mind furnishes no material for thought whatever.
 
| experience, the mind furnishes no material for thought whatever.
Line 786: Line 744:  
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
 
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
 
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
 
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 21====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 21
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| The terms 'à priori' and 'à posteriori' in their ancient sense
 
| The terms 'à priori' and 'à posteriori' in their ancient sense
 
| denote respectively reasoning from an antecedent to a consequent
 
| denote respectively reasoning from an antecedent to a consequent
Line 847: Line 803:  
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
 
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
 
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
 
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
====DET.  Note 22====
−
 
  −
DET.  Note 22
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| Though I talk of forms as something independent of the mind,
 
| Though I talk of forms as something independent of the mind,
 
| I only mean that the mind so conceives them and that that
 
| I only mean that the mind so conceives them and that that
Line 866: Line 820:  
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
 
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
 
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
 
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.
−
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
   
</pre>
 
</pre>
  
Jon Awbrey
12,080

edits

Retrieved from "https://mywikibiz.com/Special:MobileDiff/72928"

Navigation menu