| Line 1: | Line 1: | 
| − | '''Peirce's law''' is a proposition in [[propositional calculus]] that is commonly expressed in the following form: | + | '''Peirce's law''' is a formula in [[propositional calculus]] that is commonly expressed in the following form: | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  | <center> |  | <center> | 
| Line 50: | Line 50: | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  | ==Equational form== |  | ==Equational form== | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | A stronger form of Peirce's law also holds, in which the final implication is observed to be reversible: | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | <center> | 
|  | + | <p><math>((p \Rightarrow q) \Rightarrow p) \Leftrightarrow p</math></p> | 
|  | + | </center> | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | ===Proof 1=== | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Given what precedes, it remains to show that: | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | <center> | 
|  | + | <p><math>p \Rightarrow ((p \Rightarrow q) \Rightarrow p)</math></p> | 
|  | + | </center> | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | But this is immediate, since <math>p \Rightarrow (r \Rightarrow p)</math>, for any proposition <math>r.\!</math> | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | ===Proof 2=== | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Representing propositions as logical graphs under the existential interpretation, the strong form of Peirce's law is expressed by the following equation: | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | {| align="center" border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" | 
|  | + | | [[Image:Peirce's_Law_Figure_3.jpg|500px]] || (3) | 
|  | + | |} | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Using the axioms and theorems listed in the article on [[logical graphs]], the equational form of Peirce's law may be proved in the following manner: | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | {| align="center" border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" | 
|  | + | | [[Image:Peirce's_Law_Figure_4.jpg|500px]] || (4) | 
|  | + | |} | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  | ==Bibliography== |  | ==Bibliography== |