Changes

:[[User:Moulton|Moulton]] 21:37, 11 October 2008 (PDT)

:[[User:Moulton|Moulton]] 21:37, 11 October 2008 (PDT)

::Okay, FT2 is taking up my invitation to talk to Poetlister.  Note that, had anyone bothered to do this from the very start, then this would all have been resolved long ago.  Once again, if you read what I wrote to Mindspillage, I was basically trying to prove it either way once and for all.  Poetlister, however, refused to hold up a sign, and Mindspillage (and everyone else) refused to contact Poetlister.  All ego tripping on everyone's parts.  The [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=20205&st=680&p=127804&#entry127804 passage from FT2] does not in any way suggest that Zordrac and Poetlister are the same person.  Further, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mindspillage&diff=next&oldid=32464977 in the statement made to Mindspillage] it does not in any way suggest that Zordrac and Poetlister are the same person.  Zordrac (me) was investigating the ban of Poetlister.  How could they be the same person?  Read them again and perhaps you might get it.  I was trying to write the Google docs article from a 3rd person perspective, although I did sign it Blissyu2, and also stated "Zordrac is a known alias of Blissyu2".  I would have thought that that was obvious.  How can you not understand what I am saying there?  I must be missing something.  What is there to confuse you?  He says that I wrote the G. H. entry in NamesDatabase at Poetlister's request, when in the link itself it actually says that I invited Poetlister.  Simple.  How could you get that confused?  How could you think that Poetlister is telling the truth when the link he provides proves that he is lying? [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 23:05, 11 October 2008 (PDT)

::Okay, FT2 is taking up my invitation to talk to Poetlister.  Note that, had anyone bothered to do this from the very start, then this would all have been resolved long ago.  Once again, if you read what I wrote to Mindspillage, I was basically trying to prove it either way once and for all.  Poetlister, however, refused to hold up a sign, and Mindspillage (and everyone else) refused to contact Poetlister.  All ego tripping on everyone's parts.  The [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=20205&st=680&p=127804&#entry127804 passage from FT2] does not in any way suggest that Zordrac and Poetlister are the same person.  Further, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mindspillage&diff=next&oldid=32464977 in the statement made to Mindspillage] it does not in any way suggest that Zordrac and Poetlister are the same person.  Zordrac (me) was investigating the ban of Poetlister.  How could they be the same person?  Read them again and perhaps you might get it.  I was trying to write the Google docs article from a 3rd person perspective, although I did sign it Blissyu2, and also stated "Zordrac is a known alias of Blissyu2".  I would have thought that that was obvious.  How can you not understand what I am saying there?  I must be missing something.  What is there to confuse you?  He says that I wrote the G. H. entry in NamesDatabase at Poetlister's request, when in the link itself it actually says that I invited Poetlister.  Simple.  How could you get that confused?  How could you think that Proabviouc is telling the truth when the link he provides proves that he is lying? [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 23:05, 11 October 2008 (PDT)

== [[Directory:The_Wikipedia_Point_of_View | The Wikipedia Point of View]] ==

== [[Directory:The_Wikipedia_Point_of_View | The Wikipedia Point of View]] ==