Changes

Line 90: Line 90:  
For me,  wikipeida is full of degenerate and morally bankrupted, liars, plagiarizers, slanderers, and other petite criminals and intellectual bunko artists, which, My CRUDE, UNEDUCATED AND HUMBLE OPINION, makes it a moral imperative that wikipeida is called to task, in the REAL WORLD and HELD TO ACCOUNT, IN THE REAL world and NOT HIDE, LIKE SNIVELING  COWARDS, and MEELY MOUTH WORMS, to the destruction of peoples works, ideas and reputations, on the sheer whims of uncontrolled power tripping, basement dwelling pill bugs.
 
For me,  wikipeida is full of degenerate and morally bankrupted, liars, plagiarizers, slanderers, and other petite criminals and intellectual bunko artists, which, My CRUDE, UNEDUCATED AND HUMBLE OPINION, makes it a moral imperative that wikipeida is called to task, in the REAL WORLD and HELD TO ACCOUNT, IN THE REAL world and NOT HIDE, LIKE SNIVELING  COWARDS, and MEELY MOUTH WORMS, to the destruction of peoples works, ideas and reputations, on the sheer whims of uncontrolled power tripping, basement dwelling pill bugs.
 
[[User:Joehazelton|Joehazelton]] 09:07, 10 October 2008 (PDT)
 
[[User:Joehazelton|Joehazelton]] 09:07, 10 October 2008 (PDT)
 +
 +
:Joe, your passion is always inspiring to me.  I hope that I haven't given the impression that all contributors to this new project should have impressive degrees or haughty credentials.  Rather, all I ask is that the criticisms be formulated in a journalistic style of reporting that would be welcoming to an "outside" observer in the field of journalism or academia.  If we go the route of the wiki, in fact, other contributors would even be able to help collaborate with those who are heavy on passion and justice, but light on citation and narrative.  I tend to agree that there exists a surplus of sniveling cowards and mealy-mouthed worms on Wikipedia.  But, it's our job to make that clear to neutral third parties, without coming off as misguided invective.  For example, when JzG plagiarized the content of the original Arch Coal article, it was at least acceptable under the terms of the GFDL.  But when, 15 months later, he deleted the original provenance of the article and then (elsewhere) claimed that this was ethically correct, being that his version was supposedly written ''ab initio'', that was a lie, and it was an act of sniveling cowardice, for which he has still not apologized, even though it would be simple to do so.  Documenting activity like that will be an important part of helping the uninformed bystander to come to realize the passion and the justice which you wish to convey.  -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 10:49, 10 October 2008 (PDT)
    
== Blog ==
 
== Blog ==