3,209
edits
Changes
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Wednesday June 26, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to searchDirectory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Wikipaedophilia (view source)
Revision as of 11:39, 1 October 2008
, 11:39, 1 October 2008→Haiduc strange comments September 30 2008
* "What is it about the love of boys that bothers you so?" [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242013151&oldid=241992653]
* "What is it about the love of boys that bothers you so?" [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242013151&oldid=241992653]
* Reverted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242016082&oldid=242013151]
* Reverted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242016082&oldid=242013151]
On adding a section to the List of Historical Pederastic Couples, Nandesuka looks at what the sources say, which all say that Montgomery had strong, non-sexual relationships with boys [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242019112&oldid=242016082]. Haiduc replies with "what does sex have to do with it?"[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242104971&oldid=242021030], which implies that any man who has a close, non-sexual relationship with an under-aged boy is probably really a pederast. Another editors says that if that's all there is to it, then the list is probably meaningless[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242118711&oldid=242114606]. Haiduc replies by saying that it is irrelevant what editors think pederasty is, which implies that his position is the objective one[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242134631&oldid=242119238]. Squeakbox turns the mirror back towards Haiduc...[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242136118&oldid=242134631]. Haiduc says that he wasn't including himself in his statement and that his position is the "scientific" one [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242158133&oldid=242150170]. Another editor brings up "child-grooming"[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242170536&oldid=242164360]....and this comment is removed by an admin[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242185862&oldid=242170536]. The same sort of process is currently happening at "Theban Pederasty". I don't see how this can be allowed to continue, one way or the other....
== Other pages ==
== Other pages ==
* [[Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/The Encyclopedia of Homosexuality]]
* [[Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/The Encyclopedia of Homosexuality]]
