Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday November 22, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search

Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Peter Damian Evidence (view source)

Revision as of 10:31, 21 September 2008

170 bytes added ,  10:31, 21 September 2008
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
'''Evidence for the Arbitration Committee'''
 
'''Evidence for the Arbitration Committee'''
 +
 +
This page is the evidence presented by Wikipedia editor [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Peter_Damian Peter Damian] (and his previous accounts) to the Wikipedia [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RFAR Arbitration committee].
 +
 +
 +
*Principled and good-faith criticism of another person is not the same thing as a personal attack or harassment.
 +
* My criticism of the editor called FT2 has been principled and in good faith.  My actions should not therefore be labelled as 'harassment'.
 +
 +
The major premiss is clear.  Everyone accepts that fair and principled criticism of another editor's action is essential to the continued survival of the Wikipedia project.  To demonstrate the minor premiss, it will be necessary to discuss and [[#Criticism of FT2 | criticise]] some of FT2's contributions to the Wikipedia project, and to see how the [[#Blocks of Peter Damian | blocks of Peter Damian]] are connected with this.
 +
 +
    
== The Arbitration Committee (September 2008) ==
 
== The Arbitration Committee (September 2008) ==
Line 99: Line 109:  
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Villa_La_Pietra Villa La Pietra]
 
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Villa_La_Pietra Villa La Pietra]
 
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonborough_House Stonborough House]
 
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonborough_House Stonborough House]
−
  −
== Argument ==
  −
  −
My argument for unblocking is simple, as follows.
  −
  −
*Principled and good-faith criticism of another person is not the same thing as a personal attack or harassment.
  −
* My criticism of the editor called FT2 has been principled and in good faith.  My actions should not therefore be labelled as 'harassment'.
  −
  −
The major premiss is clear.  Everyone accepts that fair and principled criticism of another editor's action is essential to the continued survival of the Wikipedia project.  To demonstrate the minor premiss, it will be necessary to discuss and [[#Criticism of FT2 | criticise]] some of FT2's contributions to the Wikipedia project, and to see how the [[#Blocks of Peter Damian | blocks of Peter Damian]] are connected with this.
      
== My concerns about Wikipedia ==
 
== My concerns about Wikipedia ==
Ockham
3,209

edits

Retrieved from "https://mywikibiz.com/Special:MobileDiff/70693"

Navigation menu