Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday November 01, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 196: Line 196:     
3.  I have never accused FT2 of practising zoophilia.  My issue with this editor was (and remains) his biased and slanted editing aimed at normalising the practice of bestiality, and his arbitrarily blocking or banning of editors who aimed at restoring NPOV to the articles on this subject.
 
3.  I have never accused FT2 of practising zoophilia.  My issue with this editor was (and remains) his biased and slanted editing aimed at normalising the practice of bestiality, and his arbitrarily blocking or banning of editors who aimed at restoring NPOV to the articles on this subject.
 +
 +
13:31 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2007/Candidate_statements/FT2/Questions_for_the_candidate&diff=prev&oldid=175918157 Concern about anti-scientific bias]
 +
 +
13:37: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2007/Candidate_statements/FT2/Questions_for_the_candidate&diff=prev&oldid=175918890 5 December 2007 Concern about "scientific scepticism"]
 +
 +
18:32 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2007/Candidate_statements/FT2/Questions_for_the_candidate&diff=prev&oldid=175970978 FT2 bullying]
    
20:00 Wednesday 5 December - a dialogue with Scribe [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WJBscribe&diff=next&oldid=176045631#Favour_asked] which shows that my apologies about my remarks during the campaign, my offers of blanking page and so on, were accepted, Berry and others.  Postlethwaite was mildly reproved for having escalated the situation (which he certainly did – “you're cruising for block No.2”).  Berry “I don't think threatening more blocks here is wise. [Damian] is not a troll, he is a longstanding solid contributor in good standing.”
 
20:00 Wednesday 5 December - a dialogue with Scribe [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WJBscribe&diff=next&oldid=176045631#Favour_asked] which shows that my apologies about my remarks during the campaign, my offers of blanking page and so on, were accepted, Berry and others.  Postlethwaite was mildly reproved for having escalated the situation (which he certainly did – “you're cruising for block No.2”).  Berry “I don't think threatening more blocks here is wise. [Damian] is not a troll, he is a longstanding solid contributor in good standing.”
Line 208: Line 214:     
This was a very bad result.  Aside from fixing the outcome, it also left me with a very unfair black mark of "harassing" FT2, and left me with a ''de facto'' shoot-on-sight probation, administered by the same crowd of gullible administrators who have gathered round FT2.  These have been indefinitely blocking me any time he challenges FT2's administrative actions surrounding the articles in question, each time citing the last bad block as the reason for the new one.
 
This was a very bad result.  Aside from fixing the outcome, it also left me with a very unfair black mark of "harassing" FT2, and left me with a ''de facto'' shoot-on-sight probation, administered by the same crowd of gullible administrators who have gathered round FT2.  These have been indefinitely blocking me any time he challenges FT2's administrative actions surrounding the articles in question, each time citing the last bad block as the reason for the new one.
      
=== 29 June 2008 ===  
 
=== 29 June 2008 ===  
3,209

edits

Navigation menu