MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Tuesday November 26, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
302 bytes added
, 10:22, 19 September 2008
Line 94: |
Line 94: |
| == Argument == | | == Argument == |
| | | |
− | * There is an important difference between principled and good-faith criticism of a contributor, and personal attack or harassment.
| + | My argument for unblocking is very simple, as follows. |
− | * My criticism of the editor called FT2 has been principled and in good faith. Should not therefore be labelled as 'harassment'.
| |
| | | |
− | I will justify this by showing some of the problem with FT2's contributions to the Wikipedia project.
| + | |
| + | *(Major premiss) There is an important difference between principled and good-faith criticism of a contributor, and personal attack or harassment. |
| + | * (Minor premiss) My criticism of the editor called FT2 has been principled and in good faith. My actions should not therefore be labelled as 'harassment'. |
| + | |
| + | The major premiss is clear. Everyone accepts that fair and principled criticism of another editor's action is essential to the continued survival of the Wikipedia project. To demonstrate the minor premiss, it will be necessary to discuss and criticise some FT2's contributions to the Wikipedia project. |
| | | |
| == Blocks of Peter Damian == | | == Blocks of Peter Damian == |