MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Tuesday November 12, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
761 bytes added
, 09:15, 13 September 2008
Line 59: |
Line 59: |
| | | |
| ===The Attack=== | | ===The Attack=== |
| + | |
| + | ===Wikiquette alert - (Phdarts complains) === |
| + | |
| + | On 24 June, Phdarts complained about the behaviour of some of the PPA editors: |
| + | |
| + | :In order to encourage constructive discussion and a useful edit--discuss cycle, I instigated a Wikiquette alert upon you [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts]. Feel free to reply. [[User:Phdarts|Phdarts]] ([[User talk:Phdarts|talk]]) 14:59, 24 June 2008 (UTC) In order to encourage constructive discussion and a useful edit--discuss cycle, I instigated a Wikiquette alert upon you [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts]. Feel free to reply. [[User:Phdarts|Phdarts]] ([[User talk:Phdarts|talk]]) 14:59, 24 June 2008 (UTC) |
| + | |
| + | In return, it seems that the PPAs sought administrative action |
| | | |
− | "What has happened to the Pederasty article is unfortunate if not unprecedented. This group are obviously acting together, and their agenda is also obvious. There are so many non-sequiturs and basic fallacies which parade under a (thin) guise of academic respectability, that one can hardly begin to unravel the knots - though you have made a good fist of it in the Talk pages. I am sorry about my long absence, during which time I lost (through computer failure) much data including my Wiki log-in details, hence the identity adjustment. Like you, I am much pressed for time, though I think that matters have gone beyond personal intervention - however well-authenticated - and now demand third-party intervention (as before).
| + | :What has happened to the Pederasty article is unfortunate if not unprecedented. This group are obviously acting together, and their agenda is also obvious. There are so many non-sequiturs and basic fallacies which parade under a (thin) guise of academic respectability, that one can hardly begin to unravel the knots - though you have made a good fist of it in the Talk pages. I am sorry about my long absence, during which time I lost (through computer failure) much data including my Wiki log-in details, hence the identity adjustment. Like you, I am much pressed for time, though ''I think that matters have gone beyond personal intervention - however well-authenticated - and now demand third-party intervention (as before)''. |
| | | |
− | "The current clique is clearly not susceptible to reasoned argument, since they insist on viewing the subject from a modern standpoint with the all the distortions of terminology and current social theory.
| + | :The current clique is clearly not susceptible to reasoned argument, since they insist on viewing the subject from a modern standpoint with the all the distortions of terminology and current social theory. |
| | | |
− | "I still may throw in the odd spanner and will certainly follow your own strategy with interest. Wikipedia is of course 'democratic' in essence with all the uncertainties that brings to bear on exceptional writers like yourself. With best wishes, D. ([[User:Domniqencore|Domniqencore]] ([[User talk:Domniqencore|talk]]) 09:50, 28 June 2008 (UTC))
| + | :I still may throw in the odd spanner and will certainly follow your own strategy with interest. Wikipedia is of course 'democratic' in essence with all the uncertainties that brings to bear on exceptional writers like yourself. With best wishes, D. ([[User:Domniqencore|Domniqencore]] ([[User talk:Domniqencore|talk]]) 09:50, 28 June 2008 (UTC)) |
| [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Haiduc&diff=prev&oldid=222250643] | | [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Haiduc&diff=prev&oldid=222250643] |
| | | |