MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Thursday September 11, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to search
23 bytes added
, 11:30, 30 August 2008
Line 317: |
Line 317: |
| ===Exemplary proofs=== | | ===Exemplary proofs=== |
| | | |
− | With the meagre means afforded by the axioms and theorems given so far, it is already possible to prove a multitude of much more complex theorems. A couple of all-time favorites are given next. | + | With the meagre utilities of the axioms and theorems set down so far, it is already possible to prove a multitude of much more complex theorems. A couple of all-time favorites are given next. |
| | | |
| ====Peirce's law==== | | ====Peirce's law==== |
Line 324: |
Line 324: |
| | | |
| This section presents a proof of Peirce's law, commonly written: | | This section presents a proof of Peirce's law, commonly written: |
− | :* [[p ⇒ q] ⇒ p] ⇒ p | + | |
| + | : <math>((p \Rightarrow q) \Rightarrow p) \Rightarrow p</math> |
| | | |
| The first order of business is present the statement as it appears in the so-called ''existential interpretation'' of Peirce's own ''logical graphs''. Here is the statement of Peirce's law, as rendered under the existential interpretation into (the topological dual forms of) Peirce's logical graphs: | | The first order of business is present the statement as it appears in the so-called ''existential interpretation'' of Peirce's own ''logical graphs''. Here is the statement of Peirce's law, as rendered under the existential interpretation into (the topological dual forms of) Peirce's logical graphs: |