Line 1,321:
Line 1,321:
|-
|-
|
|
−
| align="right" | — Walt Whitman, Leaves of Grass, [Whi, 28]
+
| align="right" | — Walt Whitman, ''Leaves of Grass'', [Whi, 28]
|}
|}
Line 1,384:
Line 1,384:
|-
|-
|
|
−
| align="right" | — Walt Whitman, 'Leaves of Grass', [Whi, 79]
+
| align="right" | — Walt Whitman, ''Leaves of Grass'', [Whi, 79]
|}
|}
−
Observe that the secular inference rules, used by themselves, involve a loss of information, since nothing in them can tell us whether the momenta {(d''A''), d''A''} are preserved or changed in the next instance. In order to know this, we would have to determine d<sup>2</sup>''A'', and so on, pursuing an infinite regress. Ultimately, in order to rest with a finitely determinate system, it is necessary to make an infinite assumption, for example, that d<sup>''k''</sup>''A'' = 0 for all ''k'' greater than some fixed value ''M''. Another way to escape the regress is through the provision of a dynamic law, in typical form making higher order differentials dependent on lower degrees and estates.
+
Observe that the secular inference rules, used by themselves, involve a loss of information, since nothing in them can tell us whether the momenta <math>\{ (\operatorname{d}A), \operatorname{d}A \}</math> are changed or unchanged in the next instance. In order to know this, one would have to determine <math>\operatorname{d}^2 A,</math> and so on, pursuing an infinite regress. Ultimately, in order to rest with a finitely determinate system, it is necessary to make an infinite assumption, for example, that <math>\operatorname{d}^k A = 0</math> for all <math>k\!</math> greater than some fixed value <math>M.\!</math> Another way to escape the regress is through the provision of a dynamic law, in typical form making higher order differentials dependent on lower degrees and estates.
===Example 1. A Square Rigging===
===Example 1. A Square Rigging===