Line 2,289: |
Line 2,289: |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
| | | |
− | Written as a string, this is just the concatenation "<math>x\ y\!</math>". | + | Written as a string, this is just the concatenation "<math>xy\!</math>". |
| | | |
− | The proposition <math>x y\!</math> may be taken as a boolean function <math>f(x, y)\!</math> having the abstract type <math>f : \mathbb{B} \times \mathbb{B} \to \mathbb{B},</math> where <math>\mathbb{B} = \{ 0, 1 \}</math> is read in such a way that 0 means <math>false\!</math> and 1 means <math>true.\!</math> | + | The proposition <math>xy\!</math> may be taken as a boolean function <math>f(x, y)\!</math> having the abstract type <math>f : \mathbb{B} \times \mathbb{B} \to \mathbb{B},</math> where <math>\mathbb{B} = \{ 0, 1 \}</math> is read in such a way that 0 means <math>false</math> and 1 means <math>true.</math> |
| | | |
− | In this style of graphical representation, the value <math>true\!</math> looks like a blank label and the value <math>false\!</math> looks like an edge. | + | In this style of graphical representation, the value <math>true</math> looks like a blank label and the value <math>false</math> looks like an edge. |
| | | |
| <pre> | | <pre> |
Line 2,317: |
Line 2,317: |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
| | | |
− | Back to the proposition <math>x y.\!</math> Imagine yourself standing in a fixed cell of the corresponding venn diagram, say, the cell where the proposition <math>x y\!</math> is true, as pictured: | + | Back to the proposition <math>xy.\!</math> Imagine yourself standing in a fixed cell of the corresponding venn diagram, say, the cell where the proposition <math>xy\!</math> is true, as pictured: |
| | | |
| <pre> | | <pre> |
Line 2,345: |
Line 2,345: |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
| | | |
− | Now ask yourself: .What is the value of the proposition ''xy'' at a distance of ''dx'' and ''dy'' from the cell ''xy'' where you are standing? | + | Now ask yourself: What is the value of the proposition <math>xy\!</math> at a distance of <math>\operatorname{d}x</math> and <math>\operatorname{d}y</math> from the cell <math>xy\!</math> where you are standing? |
| | | |
− | Don't think about it -- just compute: | + | Don't think about it — just compute: |
| | | |
| <pre> | | <pre> |
Line 2,378: |
Line 2,378: |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
| | | |
− | However you draw it, these expressions follow because the expression ''x'' + ''dx'', where the plus sign indicates (mod 2) addition in '''B''', and thus corresponds to an exclusive-or in logic, parses to a graph of the following form: | + | However you draw it, these expressions follow because the expression <math>x + \operatorname{d}x,</math> where the plus sign indicates (mod 2) addition in <math>\mathbb{B},</math> and thus corresponds to an exclusive-or in logic, parses to a graph of the following form: |
| | | |
| <pre> | | <pre> |