MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday January 10, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to search
768 bytes added
, 21:22, 20 May 2008
Line 6: |
Line 6: |
| \PMlinkescapephrase{calculus} | | \PMlinkescapephrase{calculus} |
| \PMlinkescapephrase{Calculus} | | \PMlinkescapephrase{Calculus} |
− | \PMlinkescapephrase{cell}
| |
− | \PMlinkescapephrase{Cell}
| |
| \PMlinkescapephrase{circle} | | \PMlinkescapephrase{circle} |
| \PMlinkescapephrase{Circle} | | \PMlinkescapephrase{Circle} |
| \PMlinkescapephrase{collection} | | \PMlinkescapephrase{collection} |
| \PMlinkescapephrase{Collection} | | \PMlinkescapephrase{Collection} |
| + | \PMlinkescapephrase{cover} |
| + | \PMlinkescapephrase{Cover} |
| \PMlinkescapephrase{cut} | | \PMlinkescapephrase{cut} |
| \PMlinkescapephrase{Cut} | | \PMlinkescapephrase{Cut} |
| \PMlinkescapephrase{divides} | | \PMlinkescapephrase{divides} |
| \PMlinkescapephrase{Divides} | | \PMlinkescapephrase{Divides} |
− | \PMlinkescapephrase{extension}
| |
− | \PMlinkescapephrase{Extension}
| |
| \PMlinkescapephrase{language} | | \PMlinkescapephrase{language} |
| \PMlinkescapephrase{Language} | | \PMlinkescapephrase{Language} |
Line 176: |
Line 174: |
| From & $q$ & and & $\operatorname{d}q$ & infer & $\overline{q}$ & next. \\[6pt] | | From & $q$ & and & $\operatorname{d}q$ & infer & $\overline{q}$ & next. \\[6pt] |
| \end{tabular}\end{center} | | \end{tabular}\end{center} |
| + | |
| + | $\ldots$ |
| + | |
| + | \section{Transitional remarks} |
| + | |
| + | Up to this point we have been treating the universe of discourse $X,$ the quality $q,$ and the symbol $``q"$ as all of one piece, almost as if the entire context marked by $X$ and $q$ and $``q"$ amounted to the only way of viewing $X.$ That is clearly not the case, but the fact is that people often use the term ``universe of discourse" to cover a particular set of distinctions drawn in the space $X$ and even sometimes a particular calculus or language for discussing the elements of $X.$ If it were possible to coin a new phrase in this realm one might distinguish these latter components as the ``discursive universe", but there is probably no escape from simply recognizing the equivocal senses of the terms already in use and trying to clarify the senses intended in context. |
| | | |
| $\ldots$ | | $\ldots$ |