Line 3,479: |
Line 3,479: |
| ===Commentary Note 12=== | | ===Commentary Note 12=== |
| | | |
− | <pre>
| + | Let us make a few preliminary observations about the "logical sign of involution", as Peirce uses it here: |
− | Let us make a few preliminary observations about the | |
− | "logical sign of involution", as Peirce uses it here: | |
| | | |
− | | The Sign of Involution
| + | <blockquote> |
− | |
| + | <p>'''The Sign of Involution'''</p> |
− | | I shall take involution in such a sense that x^y
| |
− | | will denote everything which is an x for every
| |
− | | individual of y.
| |
− | |
| |
− | | Thus
| |
− | |
| |
− | | 'l'^w
| |
− | |
| |
− | | will be a lover of every woman.
| |
− | |
| |
− | | C.S. Peirce, CP 3.77
| |
| | | |
− | In arithmetic, the "involution" x^y, or the "exponentiation" of x
| + | <p>I shall take involution in such a sense that ''x''<sup>''y''</sup> will denote everything which is an ''x'' for every individual of ''y''.</p> |
− | to the power of y, is the iterated multiplication of the factor x,
| |
− | repeated as many times as there are ones making up the exponent y.
| |
| | | |
− | In analogous fashion, 'l'^w is the iterated multiplication of 'l',
| + | <p>Thus</p> |
− | repeated as many times as there are individuals under the term w.
| |
| | | |
− | For example, suppose that the universe of discourse has,
| + | : <p>'l'<sup>w</sup></p> |
− | among other things, just the three women, W_1, W_2, W_3.
| |
− | This could be expressed in Peirce's notation by writing:
| |
| | | |
− | w = W_1 +, W_2 +, W_3. | + | <p>will be a lover of every woman.</p> |
| + | |
| + | <p>(C.S. Peirce, CP 3.77).</p> |
| + | </blockquote> |
| + | |
| + | In arithmetic, the "involution" ''x''<sup>''y''</sup>, or the "exponentiation" of ''x'' to the power of ''y'', is the iterated multiplication of the factor ''x'', repeated as many times as there are ones making up the exponent ''y''. |
| + | |
| + | In analogous fashion, 'l'<sup>w</sup> is the iterated multiplication of 'l', repeated as many times as there are individuals under the term w. |
| + | |
| + | For example, suppose that the universe of discourse has, among other things, just the three women, W<sub>1</sub>, W<sub>2</sub>, W<sub>3</sub>. This could be expressed in Peirce's notation by writing: |
| + | |
| + | : w = W<sub>1</sub> +, W<sub>2</sub> +, W<sub>3</sub>. |
| | | |
| In this setting, we would have: | | In this setting, we would have: |
| | | |
− | 'l'^w = 'l'^(W_1 +, W_2 +, W_3) = 'l'W_1 , 'l'W_2 , 'l'W_3. | + | : 'l'<sup>w</sup> = 'l'<sup>(W<sub>1</sub> +, W<sub>2</sub> +, W<sub>3</sub>)</sup> = 'l'W<sub>1</sub> , 'l'W<sub>2</sub> , 'l'W<sub>3</sub>. |
| | | |
− | That is, a lover of every woman in the universe of discourse | + | That is, a lover of every woman in the universe of discourse would be a lover of W<sub>1</sub> and a lover of W<sub>2</sub> and lover of W<sub>3</sub>. |
− | would be a lover of W_1 and a lover of W_2 and lover of W_3. | |
− | </pre> | |
| | | |
| ==References== | | ==References== |