12,080
edits
Changes
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Wednesday April 09, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to searchDirectory:Jon Awbrey/Papers/Peirce's 1870 Logic Of Relatives (view source)
Revision as of 17:00, 6 January 2008
, 17:00, 6 January 2008→Commentary Note 11.20: markup
Line 3,164:
Line 3,164:
<pre>+</pre>+
By way of a legend for the figure, we have the following data:
By way of a legend for the figure, we have the following data:
−:{| cellpadding="4"
−| m = J +, K +, L +, M = 1
+| ''m''
−|
+| =
−| f = K +, M
+| J +, K +, L +, M
−|
+| =
−|'f' = K:K +, M:M
+| 1
−|
+|-
−|'t' = (T_001 +, ... +, T_032):J +,
+| ''f''
−| (T_033 +, ... +, T_064):K +,
+| =
−| (T_065 +, ... +, T_096):L +,
+| K +, M
−| (T_097 +, ... +, T_128):M
+|
−|
+|-
+| ''f''
+| =
+| K:K +, M:M
+|
+|
+|-
+| ''t''
+| =
+| (T<sub>001</sub> +, … +, T<sub>032</sub>):J
+|
+| +,
+|-
+|
+|
+| (T<sub>033</sub> +, … +, T<sub>064</sub>):K
+|
+| +,
+|-
+|
+|
+| (T<sub>065</sub> +, … +, T<sub>096</sub>):L
+|
+| +,
+|-
+|
+|
+| (T<sub>097</sub> +, … +, T<sub>128</sub>):M
+|
+|
+|}
Now let's see if we can use this picture to make sense of the following statement:
Now let's see if we can use this picture to make sense of the following statement:
