Changes

Line 2,897: Line 2,897:  
: ''J'' : {+} &larr; {<math>\cdot</math>}
 
: ''J'' : {+} &larr; {<math>\cdot</math>}
   −
: {+} &sube; '''R''' &times; '''R''' &times; '''R'''
+
: { + } &sube; '''R''' &times; '''R''' &times; '''R'''
   −
: {<math>\cdot \;</math>} &sube; '''R''' &times; '''R''' &times; '''R'''
+
: { <math>\cdot</math> } &sube; '''R''' &times; '''R''' &times; '''R'''
    
In many cases, one finds that both groups are written with the same sign of operation, typically "<math>\cdot</math>", "+", "*", or simple concatenation, but they remain in general distinct whether considered as operations or as relations, no matter what signs of operation are used.  In such a setting, our chiasmatic theme may run a bit like these two variants:
 
In many cases, one finds that both groups are written with the same sign of operation, typically "<math>\cdot</math>", "+", "*", or simple concatenation, but they remain in general distinct whether considered as operations or as relations, no matter what signs of operation are used.  In such a setting, our chiasmatic theme may run a bit like these two variants:
12,089

edits