One way to read this Table is in terms of the informational redundancies that it schematizes. In particular, it can be read to say that when one satisfies the constraint in the ''L'' row, along with all of the constraints in the ''J'' columns, then the constraint in the K row is automatically true. That is one way of understanding the equation: ''J''(''L''(''u'', ''v'')) = ''K''(''Ju'', ''Jv'').
+
One way to read this Table is in terms of the informational redundancies that it schematizes. In particular, it can be read to say that when one satisfies the constraint in the ''L'' row, along with all of the constraints in the ''J'' columns, then the constraint in the ''K'' row is automatically true. That is one way of understanding the equation: ''J''(''L''(''u'', ''v'')) = ''K''(''Ju'', ''Jv'').