Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Tuesday September 09, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 2,472: Line 2,472:  
===Commentary Note 11.8===
 
===Commentary Note 11.8===
   −
<pre>
+
Now let's re-examine the ''numerical incidence properties'' of relations, concentrating on the definitions of the assorted regularity conditions.
Now let's re-examine the "numerical incidence properties" of relations,
+
 
concentrating on the definitions of the assorted regularity conditions.
+
<blockquote>
 +
<p>For instance, L is said to be "''c''-regular at ''j''" if and only if the cardinality of the local flag ''L''<sub>''x''.''j''</sub> is ''c'' for all ''x'' in ''X'<sub>''j''</sub>, coded in symbols, if and only if |''L''<sub>''x''.''j''</sub>| = ''c'' for all ''x'' in ''X<sub>''j''</sub>.</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>In a similar fashion, one can define the NIP's "&lt;''c''-regular at ''j''", "&gt;''c''-regular at ''j''", and so on.  For ease of reference, I record a few of these definitions here:</p>
   −
| For instance, L is said to be "c-regular at j" if and only if
+
:{| cellpadding="6"
| the cardinality of the local flag L_x@j is c for all x in X_j,
+
| ''L'' is ''c''-regular at ''j''
| coded in symbols, if and only if |L_x@j| = c for all x in X_j.
+
| iff
|
+
| &#124;''L''<sub>''x''.''j''</sub>&#124; = ''c'' for all ''x'' in ''X''<sub>''j''</sub>.
| In a similar fashion, one can define the NIP's "<c-regular at j",
+
|-
| ">c-regular at j", and so on. For ease of reference, I record a
+
| ''L'' is (&lt;''c'')-regular at ''j
| few of these definitions here:
+
| iff
|
+
| &#124;''L''<sub>''x''.''j''</sub>&#124; &lt; ''c'' for all ''x'' in ''X''<sub>''j''</sub>.
| L is c-regular at j     iff  |L_x@j|  = c for all x in X_j.
+
|-
|
+
| L is (>c)-regular at j
| L is (<c)-regular at j   iff  |L_x@j|  < c for all x in X_j.
+
| iff
|
+
| &#124;''L''<sub>''x''.''j''</sub>&#124; &gt; ''c'' for all ''x'' in ''X''<sub>''j''</sub>.
| L is (>c)-regular at j   iff   |L_x@j> c for all x in X_j.
+
|-
|
+
| L is (=<c)-regular at j
| L is (=<c)-regular at j   iff   |L_x@j|  =< c for all x in X_j.
+
| iff
|
+
| &#124;''L''<sub>''x''.''j''</sub>&#124; &le; ''c'' for all ''x'' in ''X''<sub>''j''</sub>.
| L is (>=c)-regular at j   iff   |L_x@j>= c for all x in X_j.
+
|-
 +
| L is (>=c)-regular at j
 +
| iff
 +
| &#124;''L''<sub>''x''.''j''</sub>&#124; &ge; ''c'' for all ''x'' in ''X''<sub>''j''</sub>.
 +
|}
 +
</blockquote>
    +
<pre>
 
Clearly, if any relation is (=<c)-regular on one
 
Clearly, if any relation is (=<c)-regular on one
 
of its domains X_j and also (>=c)-regular on the
 
of its domains X_j and also (>=c)-regular on the
12,089

edits

Navigation menu