MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday September 27, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
11 bytes removed
, 03:51, 24 October 2007
Line 1,614: |
Line 1,614: |
| ===Commentary Note 10.4=== | | ===Commentary Note 10.4=== |
| | | |
− | <pre>
| + | From now on I will use the forms of analysis exemplified in the last set of Figures and Tables as a routine bridge between the logic of relative terms and the logic of their extended relations. For future reference, we may think of Table 3 as illustrating the "solitaire" or "spreadsheet" model of relational composition, while Figure 4 may be thought of as making a start toward the "hyper(di)graph" model of generalized compositions. I will explain the hypergraph model in some detail at a later point. The transitional form of analysis represented by Figure 5 may be called the "universal bracketing" of relatives as relations. |
− | From now on I will use the forms of analysis exemplified in the last set of | |
− | Figures and Tables as a routine bridge between the logic of relative terms | |
− | and the logic of their extended relations. For future reference, we may | |
− | think of Table 3 as illustrating the "solitaire" or "spreadsheet" model | |
− | of relational composition, while Figure 4 may be thought of as making | |
− | a start toward the "hyper(di)graph" model of generalized compositions. | |
− | I will explain the hypergraph model in some detail at a later point. | |
− | The transitional form of analysis represented by Figure 5 may be | |
− | called the "universal bracketing" of relatives as relations. | |
− | </pre>
| |
| | | |
| ===Commentary Note 10.5=== | | ===Commentary Note 10.5=== |