NB. On account of the fact that various listservers balk at Peirce's "marks of reference" I will make the following substitutions in Peirce's text:
−
<pre>
+
: @ = dagger symbol
−
NB. On account of the invideous circumstance that various
+
: # = double dagger
−
listservers balk at Peirce's "marks of reference" -- or is
+
: || = parallel sign
−
it only the Microsoft Cryptkeeper's kryptonizing of them? --
+
: $ = section symbol
−
I will make the following substitutions in Peirce's text:
+
: % = paragraph mark
−
@ = dagger symbol
+
It is clear from our last excerpt that Peirce is already on the verge of a graphical syntax for the logic of relatives. Indeed, it seems likely that he had already reached this point in his own thinking.
−
# = double dagger
−
|| = parallel sign
−
$ = section symbol
−
% = paragraph mark
−
It is clear from our last excerpt that Peirce is already on the verge
+
For instance, it seems quite impossible to read his last variation on the theme of a "giver of a horse to a lover of a woman" without drawing lines of identity to connect up the corresponding marks of reference, like this:
−
of a graphical syntax for the logic of relatives. Indeed, it seems
−
likely that he had already reached this point in his own thinking.
−
−
For instance, it seems quite impossible to read his last variation on the
−
theme of a "giver of a horse to a lover of a woman" without drawing lines
−
of identity to connect up the corresponding marks of reference, like this: