Line 1,852: |
Line 1,852: |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
| | | |
− | ==Work Area 1== | + | ==Discussion Work Areas== |
| + | |
| + | ==Discussion Work Area 1== |
| + | |
| <pre> | | <pre> |
| BM: Several discussions could take place there, | | BM: Several discussions could take place there, |
Line 1,940: |
Line 1,943: |
| | | |
| BM: I will be very grateful if you can make something with all that stuff. | | BM: I will be very grateful if you can make something with all that stuff. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
| + | ==Discussion Work Area 2== |
| | | |
− | | + | <pre> |
− | LOR. Work 2
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | | |
| BM: I also found this passage which may be of some interest | | BM: I also found this passage which may be of some interest |
| (CP 4.540, Prolegomena to an Apology of Pragmatism): | | (CP 4.540, Prolegomena to an Apology of Pragmatism): |
Line 1,996: |
Line 1,997: |
| way of dividing signs" is the logical theory of numbers. I give this from | | way of dividing signs" is the logical theory of numbers. I give this from |
| memory. I have not the quote at hand now but I will search for it if needed. | | memory. I have not the quote at hand now but I will search for it if needed. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
| + | ==Discussion Work Area 3== |
| | | |
− | | + | <pre> |
− | LOR. Work 3
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | | |
| BM = Bernard Morand | | BM = Bernard Morand |
| JA = Jon Awbrey | | JA = Jon Awbrey |
Line 2,103: |
Line 2,102: |
| | | |
| (c) As to the Nature of the Assurance of the Utterance | | (c) As to the Nature of the Assurance of the Utterance |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
| + | ==Discussion Work Area 4== |
| | | |
− | | + | <pre> |
− | LOR. Work 4
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | | |
| JA: It may appear that one has side-stepped the issue of empiricism | | JA: It may appear that one has side-stepped the issue of empiricism |
| that way, but then all that stuff about the synthetic a priori | | that way, but then all that stuff about the synthetic a priori |
Line 2,132: |
Line 2,129: |
| like to bring up the notion of the synthetic apriori? | | like to bring up the notion of the synthetic apriori? |
| But why? | | But why? |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
| + | ==Discussion Work Area 5== |
| | | |
− | | + | <pre> |
− | LOR. Work 5
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | | |
| HC = Howard Callaway | | HC = Howard Callaway |
| | | |
Line 2,185: |
Line 2,180: |
| But in any case, I thought I saw some better appreciation of the | | But in any case, I thought I saw some better appreciation of the |
| questions in your comments above. | | questions in your comments above. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
| + | ==Discussion Work Area 6== |
| | | |
− | | + | <pre> |
− | LOR. Work 6
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | | |
| It's been that way for about as long as anybody can remember, and | | It's been that way for about as long as anybody can remember, and |
| it will remain so, in spite of the spate of history rewriting and | | it will remain so, in spite of the spate of history rewriting and |
| image re-engineering that has become the new rage in self-styled | | image re-engineering that has become the new rage in self-styled |
| "analytic" circles. | | "analytic" circles. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
| + | ==Discussion Work Area 7== |
| | | |
− | | + | <pre> |
− | LOR. Work 7
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | | |
| The brands of objection that you continue to make, with no evidence | | The brands of objection that you continue to make, with no evidence |
| of reflection on the many explanations that I and others have taken | | of reflection on the many explanations that I and others have taken |