12,089
edits
Changes
Directory:Jon Awbrey/Papers/Peirce's 1870 Logic Of Relatives (view source)
Revision as of 17:36, 10 October 2007
, 17:36, 10 October 2007segmenting
|'Memoirs of the American Academy', Volume 9, pages 317-378, 26 January 1870,
|'Memoirs of the American Academy', Volume 9, pages 317-378, 26 January 1870,
|'Collected Papers' (CP 3.45-149), 'Chronological Edition' (CE 2, 359-429).
|'Collected Papers' (CP 3.45-149), 'Chronological Edition' (CE 2, 359-429).
</pre>
==Commentary Note 12==
<pre>
Let us make a few preliminary observations about the
Let us make a few preliminary observations about the
"logical sign of involution", as Peirce uses it here:
"logical sign of involution", as Peirce uses it here:
That is, a lover of every woman in the universe of discourse
That is, a lover of every woman in the universe of discourse
would be a lover of W_1 and a lover of W_2 and lover of W_3.
would be a lover of W_1 and a lover of W_2 and lover of W_3.
</pre>
==Work Area==
<pre>
Up to this point in the discussion, we have observed that
Up to this point in the discussion, we have observed that
the "number of" map 'v' : S -> R such that 'v's = [s] has
the "number of" map 'v' : S -> R such that 'v's = [s] has
| C.S. Peirce, CP 3.73
| C.S. Peirce, CP 3.73
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~+~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~+~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
o---------o----+----o---------o---------o----+----o---------o
o-----------------------------o-----------------------------o
o-----------------------------o-----------------------------o
| Objective Framework (OF) | Interpretive Framework (IF) |
| Objective Framework (OF) | Interpretive Framework (IF) |
as this ascii text makes him look, but uses a host of other
as this ascii text makes him look, but uses a host of other
type-faces to distinguish the types and the uses of signs.
type-faces to distinguish the types and the uses of signs.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 1==
<pre>
GR = Gary Richmond
GR = Gary Richmond
especially, philosophic accomplishments. I've seen them published
especially, philosophic accomplishments. I've seen them published
nowhere else.
nowhere else.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 2==
<pre>
BU = Ben Udell
BU = Ben Udell
JA = Jon Awbrey
JA = Jon Awbrey
contingent, which means, among other things, that
contingent, which means, among other things, that
signs are always indexical at some least quantum.
signs are always indexical at some least quantum.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 3==
<pre>
JR = Joe Ransdell
JR = Joe Ransdell
the transition from Peircean to Fregean quantifiers.
the transition from Peircean to Fregean quantifiers.
Peirce's apriorities are always hedged with risky bets.
Peirce's apriorities are always hedged with risky bets.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 4==
<pre>
BU = Benjamin Udell
BU: I wish I had more time to ponder the "many-worlds" issue (& that my books
BU: I wish I had more time to ponder the "many-worlds" issue (& that my books
were not currently disappearing into heavily taped boxes). I had thought
were not currently disappearing into heavily taped boxes). I had thought
of the piecemeal approach's opposite as the attempt to build a kind of
of the piecemeal approach's opposite as the attempt to build a kind of
more as the symptom of a localized cultural phenomenon than as
more as the symptom of a localized cultural phenomenon than as
the root cause of the broader malaise.
the root cause of the broader malaise.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 5==
<pre>
CG = Clark Goble
CG = Clark Goble
JA = Jon Awbrey
JA = Jon Awbrey
I can't recall if Boole uses this 'besides' idiom,
I can't recall if Boole uses this 'besides' idiom,
but will check later.
but will check later.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 6==
<pre>
CG = Clark Goble
CG = Clark Goble
JA = Jon Awbrey
JA = Jon Awbrey
For example, a brother of a mother is not identical to
For example, a brother of a mother is not identical to
a mother of a brother.
a mother of a brother.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 7==
<pre>
GR = Gary Richmond
GR = Gary Richmond
Speaking of which, I will have to break here, and pick up the rest later ...
Speaking of which, I will have to break here, and pick up the rest later ...
</pre>
==Discussion Note 8==
<pre>
GR = Gary Richmond
GR = Gary Richmond
And out again ...
And out again ...
</pre>
==Discussion Note 9==
<pre>
GR = Gary Richmond
GR = Gary Richmond
JA = Jon Awbrey
JA = Jon Awbrey
Best Of The Season ...
Best Of The Season ...
And Happy Trailing ...
And Happy Trailing ...
</pre>
==Discussion Note 10==
<pre>
BM = Bernard Morand
JA = Jon Awbrey
BM: Thanks for your very informative talk. There
BM: Thanks for your very informative talk. There
is a point that I did not understand in note 35:
is a point that I did not understand in note 35:
than I am able to make right now, but maybe
than I am able to make right now, but maybe
I'll get back to it later today or tomorrow.
I'll get back to it later today or tomorrow.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 11==
<pre>
BM = Bernard Morand
BM = Bernard Morand
aspect of sign relations again, if you could say more
aspect of sign relations again, if you could say more
about it.
about it.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 12==
<pre>
BM = Bernard Morand
BM = Bernard Morand
The rest I have to work at a while, and maybe go back to the Welby letters.
The rest I have to work at a while, and maybe go back to the Welby letters.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 13==
<pre>
BM = Bernard Morand
BM = Bernard Morand
review the Welby correspondence, as all this stuff was
review the Welby correspondence, as all this stuff was
a blur to my sensibilities the last 10 times I read it.
a blur to my sensibilities the last 10 times I read it.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 14==
<pre>
BM = Bernard Morand
BM = Bernard Morand
CP 8 and Wiener versions here, so I will depend on you for ample
CP 8 and Wiener versions here, so I will depend on you for ample
excerpts from the Lieb volume.
excerpts from the Lieb volume.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 15==
<pre>
I will need to go back and pick up the broader contexts of your quotes.
I will need to go back and pick up the broader contexts of your quotes.
For ease of study I break Peirce's long paragraphs into smaller pieces.
For ease of study I break Peirce's long paragraphs into smaller pieces.
You never know when the future explorer will be yourself.
You never know when the future explorer will be yourself.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 16==
<pre>
Burks, the editor of CP 8, attaches this footnote
to CP 8.342-379, "On the Classification of Signs":
Burks, the editor of CP 8, attaches this footnote
to CP 8.342-379, "On the Classification of Signs":
| From a partial draft of a letter to Lady Welby, bearing
| From a partial draft of a letter to Lady Welby, bearing
But see CP 4.549-550 for a significant distinction between
But see CP 4.549-550 for a significant distinction between
the categories (or modalities) and the orders of intention.
the categories (or modalities) and the orders of intention.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 17==
<pre>
HC = Howard Callaway
HC = Howard Callaway
JA = Jon Awbrey
JA = Jon Awbrey
Logic Of Relatives 01-41, LOR Discussion Notes 10-17.
Logic Of Relatives 01-41, LOR Discussion Notes 10-17.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 18==
<pre>
BM = Bernard Morand
BM = Bernard Morand
JA = Jon Awbrey
JA = Jon Awbrey
http://www.csd.uwo.ca/~merkle/thesis/Introduction.html
http://www.csd.uwo.ca/~merkle/thesis/Introduction.html
http://members.door.net/arisbe/menu/library/aboutcsp/merkle/hci-abstract.htm
http://members.door.net/arisbe/menu/library/aboutcsp/merkle/hci-abstract.htm
</pre>
==Discussion Note 19==
<pre>
BM = Bernard Morand
BM = Bernard Morand
JA = Jon Awbrey
JA = Jon Awbrey
q = O1:S1:I1 +, O2:S2:I2 +, O3:S3:I3 +, ...
q = O1:S1:I1 +, O2:S2:I2 +, O3:S3:I3 +, ...
</pre>
==Discussion Note 20==
<pre>
HC = Howard Callaway
HC = Howard Callaway
JR = Joe Ransdell
JR = Joe Ransdell
| We are not separated from the world by a veil of signs --
| We are not separated from the world by a veil of signs --
| we are the veil of signs.
| we are the veil of signs.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 21==
<pre>
AS = Armando Sercovich
AS = Armando Sercovich
Jon Awbrey
Jon Awbrey
</pre>
==Discussion Note 22==
<pre>
HC = Howard Callaway
HC: You quote the following passage from a prior posting of mine:
HC: What remains relatively unclear is why we should need a system of notation
HC: What remains relatively unclear is why we should need a system of notation
in which teridentity appears or is needed as against one in which it seems
in which teridentity appears or is needed as against one in which it seems
not to be needed -- since assertion of identity can be made for any number
not to be needed -- since assertion of identity can be made for any number
the variety of nominalism called "syntacticism" -- Ges-und-heit! --
the variety of nominalism called "syntacticism" -- Ges-und-heit! --
that was spread by it, however unwittedly by some of its carriers.
that was spread by it, however unwittedly by some of its carriers.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 23==
<pre>
In trying to answer the rest of your last note,
In trying to answer the rest of your last note,
it seems that we cannot go any further without
it seems that we cannot go any further without
Model Theory 01-39
Model Theory 01-39
</pre>
==Discussion Note 24==
<pre>
HC = Howard Callaway
HC = Howard Callaway
to mark the boundary between realism and nominalism in regard to
to mark the boundary between realism and nominalism in regard to
mathematical objects.
mathematical objects.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 25==
<pre>
HC = Howard Callaway
HC = Howard Callaway
JA = Jon Awbrey
JA = Jon Awbrey
but then again, who could? Everybody's a critic --
but then again, who could? Everybody's a critic --
but the better ones read first, and criticize later.
but the better ones read first, and criticize later.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 26==
<pre>
HC = Howard Callaway
HC = Howard Callaway
logical accounts of reality, finally, at long last, after an
logical accounts of reality, finally, at long last, after an
overweaningly longish adolescence, beginning to come of age.
overweaningly longish adolescence, beginning to come of age.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 27==
<pre>
HC = Howard Callaway
HC = Howard Callaway
The rest of your comments are just confused,
The rest of your comments are just confused,
and do not use the terms as they are defined.
and do not use the terms as they are defined.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 28==
<pre>
JA = Jon Awbrey
JA = Jon Awbrey
JR = Joseph Ransdell
JR = Joseph Ransdell
Cf: INTRO 30. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-November/001765.html
Cf: INTRO 30. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-November/001765.html
In: INTRO. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-November/thread.html#1720
In: INTRO. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-November/thread.html#1720
</pre>
==Discussion Note 29==
<pre>
JA = Jon Awbrey
JA = Jon Awbrey
GR = Gary Richmond
GR = Gary Richmond
Riddle A Body: "Time Enough, And Space, Excalibrate Co-Arthurs Should Apply"
Riddle A Body: "Time Enough, And Space, Excalibrate Co-Arthurs Should Apply"
</pre>
==Discussion Note 30==
<pre>
JA = Jon Awbrey
JA = Jon Awbrey
GR = Gary Richmond
GR = Gary Richmond
Body A Riddle: TEASE CASA = Fun House.
Body A Riddle: TEASE CASA = Fun House.
</pre>
==Discussion Note 31==
<pre>
Many illusions of selective reading -- like the myth that Peirce did not
Many illusions of selective reading -- like the myth that Peirce did not
discover quantification over indices until 1885 -- can be dispelled by
discover quantification over indices until 1885 -- can be dispelled by
then one can see a prototype of his much later logical graphs developing in
then one can see a prototype of his much later logical graphs developing in
the text.
the text.
</pre>
==Work Area 1==
<pre>
BM: Several discussions could take place there,
BM: Several discussions could take place there,
as to the reasons for the number of divisions,
as to the reasons for the number of divisions,