12,080
edits
Changes
Directory:Jon Awbrey/Papers/Inquiry Driven Systems (view source)
Revision as of 02:59, 31 August 2007
, 02:59, 31 August 2007→1.3.4.13. Formalization of OF : Objective Levels: courier font in table
Assertions of these relations can be read in various ways, for example:
Assertions of these relations can be read in various ways, for example:
<br>
<br><font face="courier new">
{| align="center" border="1" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" style="background:lightcyan; font-weight:bold; text-align:left; width:90%"
{| align="center" border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" style="background:lightcyan; font-weight:bold; text-align:left; width:96%"
|- style="background:paleturquoise"
|- style="background:paleturquoise"
| ''j'' : ''x'' <font face="system"><s><</s></font> ''y''
| ''j'' : ''x'' <font face="system"><s><</s></font> ''y''
| ''j'' forms ''y'' above ''x''.
| ''j'' forms ''y'' above ''x''.
|}
|}
<br>
</font><br>
In making these free interpretations of genres and motifs, one needs to read them in a ''logical'' rather than a ''cognitive'' sense. A statement like "''j'' thinks ''x'' an instance of ''y'' " should be understood as saying that "''j'' is a thought with the logical import that ''x'' is an instance of ''y'' ", and a statement like "''j'' proposes ''y'' a property of ''x'' " should be taken to mean that "''j'' is a proposition to the effect that ''y'' is a property of ''x'' ".
In making these free interpretations of genres and motifs, one needs to read them in a ''logical'' rather than a ''cognitive'' sense. A statement like "''j'' thinks ''x'' an instance of ''y'' " should be understood as saying that "''j'' is a thought with the logical import that ''x'' is an instance of ''y'' ", and a statement like "''j'' proposes ''y'' a property of ''x'' " should be taken to mean that "''j'' is a proposition to the effect that ''y'' is a property of ''x'' ".