Line 853: |
Line 853: |
| Assertions of these relations can be read in various ways, for example: | | Assertions of these relations can be read in various ways, for example: |
| | | |
− | <pre> | + | <br> |
− | j sets x in y. j sets y on x. | + | {| align="center" border="1" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" style="background:lightcyan; font-weight:bold; text-align:left; width:90%" |
− | j makes x an instance of y. j makes y a property of x. | + | |- |
− | j thinks x an instance of y. j thinks y a property of x. | + | | ''j'' sets ''x'' in ''y''. |
− | j attests x an instance of y. j attests y a property of x. | + | | ''j'' sets ''y'' on ''x''. |
− | j appoints x an instance of y. j appoints y a property of x. | + | |- |
− | j witnesses x an instance of y. j witnesses y a property of x. | + | | ''j'' makes ''x'' an instance of ''y''. |
− | j interprets x an instance of y. j interprets y a property of x. | + | | ''j'' makes ''y'' a property of ''x''. |
− | j contributes x to y. j attributes y to x. | + | |- |
− | j determines x an example of y. j determines y a quality of x. | + | | ''j'' thinks ''x'' an instance of ''y''. |
− | j evaluates x an example of y. j evaluates y a quality of x. | + | | ''j'' thinks ''y'' a property of ''x''. |
− | j proposes x an example of y. j proposes y a quality of x. | + | |- |
− | j musters x under y. j marshals y over x. | + | | ''j'' attests ''x'' an instance of ''y''. |
− | j indites x among y. j ascribes y about x. | + | | ''j'' attests ''y'' a property of ''x''. |
− | j imputes x among y. j imputes y about x. | + | |- |
− | j judges x beneath y. j judges y beyond x. | + | | ''j'' appoints ''x'' an instance of ''y''. |
− | j finds x preceding y. j finds y succeeding x. | + | | ''j'' appoints ''y'' a property of ''x''. |
− | j poses x before y. j poses y after x. | + | |- |
− | j forms x below y. j forms y above x. | + | | ''j'' witnesses ''x'' an instance of ''y''. |
− | </pre> | + | | ''j'' witnesses ''y'' a property of ''x''. |
| + | |- |
| + | | ''j'' interprets ''x'' an instance of ''y''. |
| + | | ''j'' interprets ''y'' a property of ''x''. |
| + | |- |
| + | | ''j'' contributes ''x'' to ''y''. |
| + | | ''j'' attributes ''y'' to ''x''. |
| + | |- |
| + | | ''j'' determines ''x'' an example of ''y''. |
| + | | ''j'' determines ''y'' a quality of ''x''. |
| + | |- |
| + | | ''j'' evaluates ''x'' an example of ''y''. |
| + | | ''j'' evaluates ''y'' a quality of ''x''. |
| + | |- |
| + | | ''j'' proposes ''x'' an example of ''y''. |
| + | | ''j'' proposes ''y'' a quality of ''x''. |
| + | |- |
| + | | ''j'' musters ''x'' under ''y''. |
| + | | ''j'' marshals ''y'' over ''x''. |
| + | |- |
| + | | ''j'' indites ''x'' among ''y''. |
| + | | ''j'' ascribes ''y'' about ''x''. |
| + | |- |
| + | | ''j'' imputes ''x'' among ''y''. |
| + | | ''j'' imputes ''y'' about ''x''. |
| + | |- |
| + | | ''j'' judges ''x'' beneath ''y''. |
| + | | ''j'' judges ''y'' beyond ''x''. |
| + | |- |
| + | | ''j'' finds ''x'' preceding ''y''. |
| + | | ''j'' finds ''y'' succeeding ''x''. |
| + | |- |
| + | | ''j'' poses ''x'' before ''y''. |
| + | | ''j'' poses ''y'' after ''x''. |
| + | |- |
| + | | ''j'' forms ''x'' below ''y''. |
| + | | ''j'' forms ''y'' above ''x''. |
| + | |} |
| + | <br> |
| | | |
| In making these free interpretations of genres and motifs, one needs to read them in a ''logical'' rather than a ''cognitive'' sense. A statement like "''j'' thinks ''x'' an instance of ''y'' " should be understood as saying that "''j'' is a thought with the logical import that ''x'' is an instance of ''y'' ", and a statement like "''j'' proposes ''y'' a property of ''x'' " should be taken to mean that "''j'' is a proposition to the effect that ''y'' is a property of ''x'' ". | | In making these free interpretations of genres and motifs, one needs to read them in a ''logical'' rather than a ''cognitive'' sense. A statement like "''j'' thinks ''x'' an instance of ''y'' " should be understood as saying that "''j'' is a thought with the logical import that ''x'' is an instance of ''y'' ", and a statement like "''j'' proposes ''y'' a property of ''x'' " should be taken to mean that "''j'' is a proposition to the effect that ''y'' is a property of ''x'' ". |