Line 96: |
Line 96: |
| <br> | | <br> |
| | | |
− | {| align="center" style="width:92%" | + | {| align="center" style="width:100%" |
| | width="50%" | | | | width="50%" | |
| {| align="center" border="1" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" style="text-align:center; width:90%" | | {| align="center" border="1" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" style="text-align:center; width:90%" |
− | |+ style="height:30px" | <math>\text{Table 1a.} ~~ {L_\mathrm{A}} = \text{Sign Relation of Interpreter A}\!</math> | + | |+ style="height:30px" | <math>\text{Table 1a.} ~ {L_\mathrm{A}} = \text{Sign Relation of Interpreter A}\!</math> |
| |- style="height:40px; background:ghostwhite" | | |- style="height:40px; background:ghostwhite" |
| | style="width:33%" | <math>\text{Object}\!</math> | | | style="width:33%" | <math>\text{Object}\!</math> |
Line 139: |
Line 139: |
| | width="50%" | | | | width="50%" | |
| {| align="center" border="1" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" style="text-align:center; width:90%" | | {| align="center" border="1" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" style="text-align:center; width:90%" |
− | |+ style="height:30px" | <math>\text{Table 1b.} ~~ {L_\mathrm{B}} = \text{Sign Relation of Interpreter B}\!</math> | + | |+ style="height:30px" | <math>\text{Table 1b.} ~ {L_\mathrm{B}} = \text{Sign Relation of Interpreter B}\!</math> |
| |- style="height:40px; background:ghostwhite" | | |- style="height:40px; background:ghostwhite" |
| | style="width:33%" | <math>\text{Object}\!</math> | | | style="width:33%" | <math>\text{Object}\!</math> |
Line 773: |
Line 773: |
| ===Secondary sources=== | | ===Secondary sources=== |
| | | |
− | * Awbrey, J.L., and Awbrey, S.M. (1995), “Interpretation as Action : The Risk of Inquiry”, ''Inquiry : Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines'' 15(1), pp. 40–52. [http://web.archive.org/web/19970626071826/http://chss.montclair.edu/inquiry/fall95/awbrey.html Archive]. [http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey/Papers/1302117/Interpretation_as_Action_The_Risk_of_Inquiry Online]. | + | * Awbrey, J.L., and Awbrey, S.M. (Autumn 1995), “Interpretation as Action : The Risk of Inquiry”, ''Inquiry : Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines'' 15(1), pp. 40–52. [https://web.archive.org/web/19970626071826/http://chss.montclair.edu/inquiry/fall95/awbrey.html Archive]. [https://www.pdcnet.org/inquiryct/content/inquiryct_1995_0015_0001_0040_0052 Journal]. [https://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey/Papers/1302117/Interpretation_as_Action_The_Risk_of_Inquiry Online]. |
| | | |
| * Deledalle, Gérard (2000), ''C.S. Peirce's Philosophy of Signs'', Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN. | | * Deledalle, Gérard (2000), ''C.S. Peirce's Philosophy of Signs'', Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN. |
Line 783: |
Line 783: |
| * Fisch, Max (1986), ''Peirce, Semeiotic, and Pragmatism'', Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN. | | * Fisch, Max (1986), ''Peirce, Semeiotic, and Pragmatism'', Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN. |
| | | |
− | * Houser, N., Roberts, D.D., and Van Evra, J. (eds.)(1997), ''Studies in the Logic of C.S. Peirce'', Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN. | + | * Houser, N., Roberts, D.D., and Van Evra, J. (eds., 1997), ''Studies in the Logic of C.S. Peirce'', Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN. |
| | | |
| * Liszka, J.J. (1996), ''A General Introduction to the Semeiotic of C.S. Peirce'', Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN. | | * Liszka, J.J. (1996), ''A General Introduction to the Semeiotic of C.S. Peirce'', Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN. |
| | | |
− | * Misak, C. (ed.)(2004), ''Cambridge Companion to C.S. Peirce'', Cambridge University Press. | + | * Misak, C. (ed., 2004), ''Cambridge Companion to C.S. Peirce'', Cambridge University Press. |
| | | |
| * Moore, E., and Robin, R. (1964), ''Studies in the Philosophy of C.S. Peirce, Second Series'', University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, MA. | | * Moore, E., and Robin, R. (1964), ''Studies in the Philosophy of C.S. Peirce, Second Series'', University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, MA. |