Changes

=====Politics of Language Standardisation, Nationalistic and Communist Ideologies =====

=====Politics of Language Standardisation, Nationalistic and Communist Ideologies =====

The ''politics'' of language standardisation is the issue at heart when it comes to the telling the story of Southern Slavic languages  In the 19th century Slavic language standardisation entered into the mix.<ref>Other languages commonly used in the region included, Romance Dalmatian, Old Venetian, [[Hungary|Hungarians (Magyars)]] and written [[Latin]].</ref>  The question should be asked.  

The ''politics'' of language standardisation is the issue at heart when it comes to the telling the story of Southern Slavic languages. In the 19th century Slavic language standardisation entered into the mix.<ref>Other languages commonly used in the region included, Romance Dalmatian, Old Venetian, [[Hungary|Hungarians (Magyars)]] and written [[Latin]].</ref>  The question should be asked.  

''Did the 19th century scholars and linguist do their research scientifically or were they seriously influenced by the politics of the future 19 century super Southern Slavic State?''  

''Did the 19th century scholars and linguist do their research scientifically or were they seriously influenced by the politics of the future 19 century super Southern Slavic State?''  

In 1918 a construct Serbo-Croatian language was introduced as government policy with the creation of Yugoslavia.  Before Yugoslavia came  into being the policy was first started to be implemented by Austro-Hungarian Empire in the west and the east the Kingdom of Serbia.

In 1918 a construct Serbo-Croatian language was introduced as government policy with the creation of Yugoslavia.  Before Yugoslavia came  into being the policy was first started to be implemented by Austro-Hungarian Empire in the west and the east the Kingdom of Serbia.

   

   

There appears to be a common misconception that if you are taught and you learn to speak the standardised Serbo-Croatian language that you have historical connections to an particular ethnic group. This is not necessarily factual as many other ethnic groups, with various ethnic backgrounds, were caught up in this system of standardisation through being forced to speak a ''common  standardised language'' (Serbo-Croatian). This does not necessarily directly related to the actual ancestry and ethnic history of the speaker.  

There appears to be a common misconception that if you are taught and you learn to speak the standardised Serbo-Croatian language that you have historical connections to an particular ethnic group. This is not necessarily factual as many other ethnic groups, with various ethnic backgrounds, that were caught up in this system of standardisation through being forced to speak a ''common  standardised language'' (Serbo-Croatian). This does not necessarily directly related to the actual ancestry and ethnic history of the speaker.  

Another important question to ask is '''how far''' back does one go in proclaiming Croatian nationhood or any other nationhood? In the past the Yugoslav Communist party, Pan-Slavists and the Croatian Nationalistic movements have taken this to extremes. These Pan-Slaviic, Nationalistic and Communist ideologies have created so much pain, destruction and falsehoods by clinging to these false beliefs.  

Another important question to ask is '''how far''' back does one go in proclaiming Croatian nationhood or any other nationhood? In the past the Yugoslav Communist party, Pan-Slavists and the Croatian Nationalistic movements have taken this to extremes. These Pan-Slaviic, Nationalistic and Communist ideologies have created so much pain, destruction and falsehoods by clinging to these false beliefs.