Line 9,093: |
Line 9,093: |
| | | |
| ==Current Work== | | ==Current Work== |
− |
| |
− | <br>
| |
− |
| |
− | The semiotic equivalence relation given by <math>\operatorname{Con}^1 (L_\text{A})\!</math> for interpreter <math>\text{A}\!</math> has the following semiotic equations.
| |
− |
| |
− | {| cellpadding="10"
| |
− | | width="10%" |
| |
− | | <math>[ {}^{\langle} \text{A} {}^{\rangle} ]_\text{A}\!</math>
| |
− | | <math>=\!</math>
| |
− | | <math>[ {}^{\langle} \text{i} {}^{\rangle} ]_\text{A}\!</math>
| |
− | | width="20%" |
| |
− | | <math>[ {}^{\langle} \text{B} {}^{\rangle} ]_\text{A}\!</math>
| |
− | | <math>=\!</math>
| |
− | | <math>[ {}^{\langle} \text{u} {}^{\rangle} ]_\text{A}\!</math>
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | width="10%" | or
| |
− | | <math>{}^{\langle} \text{A} {}^{\rangle}\!</math>
| |
− | | <math>=_\text{A}\!</math>
| |
− | | <math>{}^{\langle} \text{i} {}^{\rangle}\!</math>
| |
− | | width="20%" |
| |
− | | <math>{}^{\langle} \text{B} {}^{\rangle}\!</math>
| |
− | | <math>=_\text{A}\!</math>
| |
− | | <math>{}^{\langle} \text{u} {}^{\rangle}\!</math>
| |
− | |}
| |
− |
| |
− | These equations induce the following semiotic partition.
| |
− |
| |
− | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%"
| |
− | |
| |
− | <math>
| |
− | \{
| |
− | \{ {}^{\langle} \text{A} {}^{\rangle}, {}^{\langle} \text{i} {}^{\rangle} \},
| |
− | \{ {}^{\langle} \text{B} {}^{\rangle}, {}^{\langle} \text{u} {}^{\rangle} \},
| |
− | \{ {}^{\langle\langle} \text{A} {}^{\rangle\rangle} \},
| |
− | \{ {}^{\langle\langle} \text{i} {}^{\rangle\rangle} \},
| |
− | \{ {}^{\langle\langle} \text{B} {}^{\rangle\rangle} \},
| |
− | \{ {}^{\langle\langle} \text{u} {}^{\rangle\rangle} \}
| |
− | \}.\!
| |
− | </math>
| |
− | |}
| |
− |
| |
− | The semiotic equivalence relation given by <math>\operatorname{Con}^1 (L_\text{B})\!</math> for interpreter <math>\text{B}\!</math> has the following semiotic equations.
| |
− |
| |
− | {| cellpadding="10"
| |
− | | width="10%" |
| |
− | | <math>[ {}^{\langle} \text{A} {}^{\rangle} ]_\text{B}\!</math>
| |
− | | <math>=\!</math>
| |
− | | <math>[ {}^{\langle} \text{u} {}^{\rangle} ]_\text{B}\!</math>
| |
− | | width="20%" |
| |
− | | <math>[ {}^{\langle} \text{B} {}^{\rangle} ]_\text{B}\!</math>
| |
− | | <math>=\!</math>
| |
− | | <math>[ {}^{\langle} \text{i} {}^{\rangle} ]_\text{B}\!</math>
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | width="10%" | or
| |
− | | <math>{}^{\langle} \text{A} {}^{\rangle}\!</math>
| |
− | | <math>=_\text{B}\!</math>
| |
− | | <math>{}^{\langle} \text{u} {}^{\rangle}\!</math>
| |
− | | width="20%" |
| |
− | | <math>{}^{\langle} \text{B} {}^{\rangle}\!</math>
| |
− | | <math>=_\text{B}\!</math>
| |
− | | <math>{}^{\langle} \text{i} {}^{\rangle}\!</math>
| |
− | |}
| |
− |
| |
− | These equations induce the following semiotic partition.
| |
− |
| |
− | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%"
| |
− | |
| |
− | <math>
| |
− | \{
| |
− | \{ {}^{\langle} \text{A} {}^{\rangle}, {}^{\langle} \text{u} {}^{\rangle} \},
| |
− | \{ {}^{\langle} \text{B} {}^{\rangle}, {}^{\langle} \text{i} {}^{\rangle} \},
| |
− | \{ {}^{\langle\langle} \text{A} {}^{\rangle\rangle} \},
| |
− | \{ {}^{\langle\langle} \text{i} {}^{\rangle\rangle} \},
| |
− | \{ {}^{\langle\langle} \text{B} {}^{\rangle\rangle} \},
| |
− | \{ {}^{\langle\langle} \text{u} {}^{\rangle\rangle} \}
| |
− | \}.\!
| |
− | </math>
| |
− | |}
| |
| | | |
| <br> | | <br> |