12,080
edits
Changes
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Tuesday February 18, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to searchDirectory:Jon Awbrey/Papers/Inquiry Driven Systems : Part 6 (view source)
Revision as of 16:01, 21 April 2013
, 16:01, 21 April 2013→6.42. Sign Processes : A Start: markup
The dynamic realizations of the sign relations <math>L(\text{A})\!</math> and <math>L(\text{B})\!</math> augment their semantic equivalence relations in an “attractive” way. To describe this additional structure, I introduce a set of graph-theoretical concepts and notations.
The dynamic realizations of the sign relations <math>L(\text{A})\!</math> and <math>L(\text{B})\!</math> augment their semantic equivalence relations in an “attractive” way. To describe this additional structure, I introduce a set of graph-theoretical concepts and notations.
The ''attractor'' of <math>x\!</math> in <math>Y.\!</math>
The "attractor" of X in Y.
{| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%"
|
<math>Y ~\text{at}~ x ~=~ \operatorname{At}[x]_Y ~=~ [x]_Y \cup \{ \text{arcs into}~ [x]_Y \}.</math>
|}
<pre>
In effect, this discussion of dynamic realizations of sign relations has advanced from considering SEPs as partitioning the set of points in S to considering attractors as partitioning the set of arcs in SxI = SxS.
In effect, this discussion of dynamic realizations of sign relations has advanced from considering SEPs as partitioning the set of points in S to considering attractors as partitioning the set of arcs in SxI = SxS.
</pre>
</pre>
