Line 8,795: |
Line 8,795: |
| | | |
| {| align="center" cellspacing="8" width="90%" | | {| align="center" cellspacing="8" width="90%" |
− | | <math>\operatorname{Proj}^{(2)}(L) ~=~ (\operatorname{proj}_{12}(L), \operatorname{proj}_{13}(L), \operatorname{proj}_{23}(L)).</math> | + | | <math>\operatorname{Proj}^{(2)} L ~=~ (\operatorname{proj}_{12} L, ~ \operatorname{proj}_{13} L, ~ \operatorname{proj}_{23} L).\!</math> |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
− | If <math>L\!</math> is visualized as a solid body in the 3-dimensional space <math>X \times Y \times Z,\!</math> then <math>\operatorname{Proj}^{(2)}(L)\!</math> can be visualized as the arrangement or ordered collection of shadows it throws on the <math>XY,\!</math> <math>XZ,\!</math> and <math>YZ\!</math> planes, respectively. | + | If <math>L\!</math> is visualized as a solid body in the 3-dimensional space <math>X \times Y \times Z,\!</math> then <math>\operatorname{Proj}^{(2)} L\!</math> can be visualized as the arrangement or ordered collection of shadows it throws on the <math>XY, ~ XZ, ~ YZ\!</math> planes, respectively. |
| | | |
− | A couple of set-theoretic constructions are worth introducing at this point, in particular for describing the source and target domains of the projection operator <math>\operatorname{Proj}^{(2)}.\!</math>
| + | Two more set-theoretic constructions are worth introducing at this point, in particular for describing the source and target domains of the projection operator <math>\operatorname{Proj}^{(2)}.\!</math> |
| | | |
− | <pre>
| + | The set of subsets of a set <math>S\!</math> is called the ''power set'' of <math>S.\!</math> This object is denoted by either of the forms <math>\operatorname{Pow}(S)\!</math> or <math>2^S\!</math> and defined as follows: |
− | 1. The set of subsets of a set S is called the "power set" of S. This object is denoted by either of the forms "Pow (S)" or "2S" and defined as follows:
| |
| | | |
− | Pow (S) = 2S = {T : T c S}. | + | {| align="center" cellspacing="8" width="90%" |
| + | | <math>\operatorname{Pow}(S) ~=~ 2^S ~=~ \{ T : T \subseteq S \}.\!</math> |
| + | |} |
| | | |
− | The power set notation can be used to provide an alternative description of relations. In the case where S is a cartesian product, say S = X1x...xXn, then each n place relation described as a subset of S, say as R c X1x...xXn, is equally well described as an element of Pow (S), in other words, as R C Pow (X1x...xXn). | + | The power set notation can be used to provide an alternative description of relations. In the case where <math>S\!</math> is a cartesian product, say <math>S = X_1 \times \ldots \times X_n,\!</math> then each <math>n\!</math>-place relation <math>L\!</math> described as a subset of <math>S,\!</math> say <math>L \subseteq X_1 \times \ldots \times X_n,\!</math> is equally well described as an element of <math>\operatorname{Pow}(S),\!</math> in other words, as <math>L \in \operatorname{Pow}(X_1 \times \ldots \times X_n).\!</math> |
| | | |
− | 2. The set of triples of dyadic relations, with pairwise cartesian products chosen in a pre arranged order from a triple of three sets <X, Y, Z>, is called the "dyadic explosion" of XxYxZ. This object is denoted by "Explo (X, Y, Z; 2)", read as the "explosion of XxYxZ by 2s", or more simply as "X, Y, Z, choose 2", and defined as follows:
| + | <pre> |
| + | The set of triples of dyadic relations, with pairwise cartesian products chosen in a pre-arranged order from a triple of three sets (X, Y, Z), is called the ''dyadic explosion'' of XxYxZ. This object is denoted by "Explo (X, Y, Z; 2)", read as the "explosion of XxYxZ by twos", or more simply as "X, Y, Z, choose 2", and defined as follows:</p> |
| | | |
− | Explo (X, Y, Z; 2) = Pow (XxY) x Pow (XxZ) x Pow (YxZ). | + | {| align="center" cellspacing="8" width="90%" |
| + | | <math>\operatorname{Explo}(X, Y, Z | 2) ~=~ \operatorname{Pow}(X \times Y) \times \operatorname{Pow}(X \times Z) \times \operatorname{Pow}(Y \times Z).\!</math> |
| + | |} |
| | | |
| This domain is defined well enough to serve the immediate purposes of this section, but later it will become necessary to examine its construction more closely. | | This domain is defined well enough to serve the immediate purposes of this section, but later it will become necessary to examine its construction more closely. |