Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Wednesday November 27, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 8,280: Line 8,280:     
There are two methods for attempting to disentangle this confusion that are generally tried, the first more rarely, the second quite frequently, though apparently in opposite proportion to their respective chances of actual success.  In order to describe the rationales of these methods I need to introduce a number of technical concepts.
 
There are two methods for attempting to disentangle this confusion that are generally tried, the first more rarely, the second quite frequently, though apparently in opposite proportion to their respective chances of actual success.  In order to describe the rationales of these methods I need to introduce a number of technical concepts.
 +
 +
Suppose <math>P\!</math> and <math>Q\!</math> are dyadic relations, with <math>P \subseteq X \times Y\!</math> and <math>Q \subseteq Y \times Z.\!</math>  Then the ''contension'' of <math>P\!</math> and <math>Q\!</math>  is a triadic relation <math>R \subseteq X \times Y \times Z\!</math> that is notated as <math>R = P\!\!\And\!\!Q\!</math> and defined as follows:
    
<pre>
 
<pre>
Suppose that P and Q are dyadic relations, with P c XxY and Q c YxZ.  Then the "contension" of P and Q is a triadic relation R c XxYxZ that is notated as R = P&Q and defined as follows:
  −
   
P&Q  =  {<x, y, z> C XxYxZ : <x, y> C P and <y, z> C Q}.
 
P&Q  =  {<x, y, z> C XxYxZ : <x, y> C P and <y, z> C Q}.
  
12,080

edits

Navigation menu