Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Wednesday April 09, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to search

User:Jon Awbrey/Philosophical Notes (view source)

Revision as of 21:08, 10 October 2012

1,889 bytes removed ,  21:08, 10 October 2012
→‎DIEP. De In Esse Predication
Line 9: Line 9:     
==DIEP. De In Esse Predication==
 
==DIEP. De In Esse Predication==
 +
 +
===Note 1===
    
<pre>
 
<pre>
−
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
  −
  −
DIEP.  Note 1
  −
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
  −
   
| [A Boolian Algebra With One Constant]
 
| [A Boolian Algebra With One Constant]
 
|
 
|
Line 33: Line 29:  
|
 
|
 
| C.S. Peirce, CP 4.12, untitled paper circa 1880.
 
| C.S. Peirce, CP 4.12, untitled paper circa 1880.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
===Note 2===
−
 
  −
DIEP.  Note 2
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| [A Boolian Algebra With One Constant] (cont.)
 
| [A Boolian Algebra With One Constant] (cont.)
 
|
 
|
Line 68: Line 62:  
|
 
|
 
| C.S. Peirce, CP 4.13, untitled paper circa 1880.
 
| C.S. Peirce, CP 4.13, untitled paper circa 1880.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
===Note 3===
−
 
  −
DIEP.  Note 3
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| [A Boolian Algebra With One Constant] (cont.)
 
| [A Boolian Algebra With One Constant] (cont.)
 
|
 
|
Line 96: Line 88:  
|
 
|
 
| C.S. Peirce, CP 4.14, untitled paper circa 1880.
 
| C.S. Peirce, CP 4.14, untitled paper circa 1880.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
===Note 4===
−
 
  −
DIEP.  Note 4
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| I have maintained since 1867 that there is but one primary and fundamental
 
| I have maintained since 1867 that there is but one primary and fundamental
 
| logical relation, that of illation, expressed by 'ergo'.  A proposition,
 
| logical relation, that of illation, expressed by 'ergo'.  A proposition,
Line 120: Line 110:  
|"The Regenerated Logic", 'Monist', vol. 7,
 
|"The Regenerated Logic", 'Monist', vol. 7,
 
| pp. 19-40, 1896.
 
| pp. 19-40, 1896.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
===Note 5===
−
 
  −
DIEP.  Note 5
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| Cicero and other ancient writers mention a great dispute between
 
| Cicero and other ancient writers mention a great dispute between
 
| two logicians, Diodorus and Philo, in regard to the significance
 
| two logicians, Diodorus and Philo, in regard to the significance
Line 143: Line 131:  
|"The Regenerated Logic", 'Monist', vol. 7,
 
|"The Regenerated Logic", 'Monist', vol. 7,
 
| pp. 19-40, 1896.
 
| pp. 19-40, 1896.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
===Note 6===
−
 
  −
DIEP.  Note 6
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| In order to explain these positions, it is best
 
| In order to explain these positions, it is best
 
| to mention that 'possibility' may be understood
 
| to mention that 'possibility' may be understood
Line 185: Line 171:  
|"The Regenerated Logic", 'Monist', vol. 7,
 
|"The Regenerated Logic", 'Monist', vol. 7,
 
| pp. 19-40, 1896.
 
| pp. 19-40, 1896.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
===Note 7===
−
 
  −
DIEP.  Note 7
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| Although the Philonian views lead to such inconveniences as that it
 
| Although the Philonian views lead to such inconveniences as that it
 
| is true, as a consequence 'de inesse', that if the Devil were elected
 
| is true, as a consequence 'de inesse', that if the Devil were elected
Line 208: Line 192:  
|"The Regenerated Logic", 'Monist', vol. 7,
 
|"The Regenerated Logic", 'Monist', vol. 7,
 
| pp. 19-40, 1896.
 
| pp. 19-40, 1896.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
===Note 8===
−
 
  −
DIEP.  Note 8
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| The consequence 'de inesse', "if A is true, then B is true",
 
| The consequence 'de inesse', "if A is true, then B is true",
 
| is expressed by letting i denote the actual state of things,
 
| is expressed by letting i denote the actual state of things,
Line 245: Line 227:  
|"The Regenerated Logic", 'The Monist', vol. 7,
 
|"The Regenerated Logic", 'The Monist', vol. 7,
 
| pp. 19-40, 1896.
 
| pp. 19-40, 1896.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
===Note 9===
−
 
  −
DIEP.  Note 9
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| The question is what is the sense which is most usefully attached
 
| The question is what is the sense which is most usefully attached
 
| to the hypothetical proposition in logic?  Now, the peculiarity of
 
| to the hypothetical proposition in logic?  Now, the peculiarity of
Line 293: Line 273:  
|"On the Algebra of Logic:  A Contribution to the Philosophy of Notation",
 
|"On the Algebra of Logic:  A Contribution to the Philosophy of Notation",
 
|'American Journal of Mathematics', vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 180-202, 1885.
 
|'American Journal of Mathematics', vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 180-202, 1885.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
===Note 10===
−
 
  −
DIEP.  Note 10
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| Indexical Dicisigns seem to have no important varieties;  but propositions are
 
| Indexical Dicisigns seem to have no important varieties;  but propositions are
 
| divisible, generally by dichotomy primarily in various ways.  In the first place,
 
| divisible, generally by dichotomy primarily in various ways.  In the first place,
Line 316: Line 294:  
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 2.323,
 
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 2.323,
 
| from an unpublished "Syllabus", circa 1902.
 
| from an unpublished "Syllabus", circa 1902.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
===Note 11===
−
 
  −
DIEP.  Note 11
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| It remains to show in what manner I suppose the ideas of the other forms
 
| It remains to show in what manner I suppose the ideas of the other forms
 
| of propositions to be evolved;  and this will be a chapter of what I have
 
| of propositions to be evolved;  and this will be a chapter of what I have
Line 351: Line 327:  
| are one in essence, with some connected matters",
 
| are one in essence, with some connected matters",
 
| circa 1895.
 
| circa 1895.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
===Note 12===
−
 
  −
DIEP.  Note 12
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| It must be remembered that
 
| It must be remembered that
 
| possibility and necessity
 
| possibility and necessity
Line 366: Line 340:  
|"The Gamma Part of Existential Graphs",
 
|"The Gamma Part of Existential Graphs",
 
|"Lowell Lectures of 1903", Lecture 4.
 
|"Lowell Lectures of 1903", Lecture 4.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
===Note 13===
−
 
  −
DIEP.  Note 13
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| A modal dyadic relation is either a relation between characters
 
| A modal dyadic relation is either a relation between characters
 
| (including qualities and relations of individuals, of characters,
 
| (including qualities and relations of individuals, of characters,
Line 419: Line 391:  
|'A Syllabus of Certain Topics of Logic', intended
 
|'A Syllabus of Certain Topics of Logic', intended
 
| as a supplement to the "Lowell Lectures of 1903".
 
| as a supplement to the "Lowell Lectures of 1903".
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
===Note 14===
−
 
  −
DIEP.  Note 14
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| Introduction to the Logic of Quantity
 
| Introduction to the Logic of Quantity
 
|
 
|
Line 462: Line 432:  
|"The Logic of Relatives", 'Monist', vol. 7,
 
|"The Logic of Relatives", 'Monist', vol. 7,
 
| pp. 161-217, 1897.
 
| pp. 161-217, 1897.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
===Note 15===
−
 
  −
DIEP.  Note 15
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| Introduction to the Logic of Quantity (cont.)
 
| Introduction to the Logic of Quantity (cont.)
 
|
 
|
Line 507: Line 475:  
|"The Logic of Relatives", 'Monist', vol. 7,
 
|"The Logic of Relatives", 'Monist', vol. 7,
 
| pp. 161-217, 1897.
 
| pp. 161-217, 1897.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
===Note 16===
−
 
  −
DIEP.  Note 16
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| Introduction to the Logic of Quantity (cont.)
 
| Introduction to the Logic of Quantity (cont.)
 
|
 
|
Line 545: Line 511:  
|"The Logic of Relatives", 'Monist', vol. 7,
 
|"The Logic of Relatives", 'Monist', vol. 7,
 
| pp. 161-217, 1897.
 
| pp. 161-217, 1897.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
===Note 17===
−
 
  −
DIEP.  Note 17
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| A few of the most frequently recurring scholastic phrases follow.  ...
 
| A few of the most frequently recurring scholastic phrases follow.  ...
 
|
 
|
Line 583: Line 547:  
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 2.361, in dictionary entry for "Predication",
 
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 2.361, in dictionary entry for "Predication",
 
| J.M. Baldwin (ed.), 'Dictionary of Philosophy & Psychology', vol. 2, pp. 326-329.
 
| J.M. Baldwin (ed.), 'Dictionary of Philosophy & Psychology', vol. 2, pp. 326-329.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
===Note 18===
−
 
  −
DIEP.  Note 18
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
I need to go back and repair an omission.
 
I need to go back and repair an omission.
 
It occurs at the point in CP 3.527 where
 
It occurs at the point in CP 3.527 where
Line 618: Line 580:  
|"The Logic of Relatives", 'Monist', vol. 7,
 
|"The Logic of Relatives", 'Monist', vol. 7,
 
| pp. 161-217, 1897.  Marginal note, 1908.
 
| pp. 161-217, 1897.  Marginal note, 1908.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
===Note 19===
−
 
  −
DIEP.  Note 19
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
| The other divisions of terms, propositions, and arguments
 
| The other divisions of terms, propositions, and arguments
 
| arise from the distinction of extension and comprehension.
 
| arise from the distinction of extension and comprehension.
Line 655: Line 615:  
|'Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences',
 
|'Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences',
 
| vol. 7, pp. 287-298, 1867.
 
| vol. 7, pp. 287-298, 1867.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
===Note 20===
−
 
  −
DIEP.  Note 20
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
CP 2.418
 
CP 2.418
   −
 
+
<pre>
 
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
 
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
   Line 1,392: Line 1,350:  
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
 
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
−
      
==HAPA. Hypostatic And Prescisive Abstraction==
 
==HAPA. Hypostatic And Prescisive Abstraction==
Jon Awbrey
12,080

edits

Retrieved from "https://mywikibiz.com/Special:MobileDiff/165254"

Navigation menu