12,080
edits
Changes
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday November 22, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to searchUser:Jon Awbrey/Philosophical Notes (view source)
Revision as of 21:08, 10 October 2012
, 21:08, 10 October 2012→DIEP. De In Esse Predication
==DIEP. De In Esse Predication==
==DIEP. De In Esse Predication==
===Note 1===
<pre>
<pre>
| [A Boolian Algebra With One Constant]
| [A Boolian Algebra With One Constant]
|
|
|
|
| C.S. Peirce, CP 4.12, untitled paper circa 1880.
| C.S. Peirce, CP 4.12, untitled paper circa 1880.
</pre>
===Note 2===
<pre>
| [A Boolian Algebra With One Constant] (cont.)
| [A Boolian Algebra With One Constant] (cont.)
|
|
|
|
| C.S. Peirce, CP 4.13, untitled paper circa 1880.
| C.S. Peirce, CP 4.13, untitled paper circa 1880.
</pre>
===Note 3===
<pre>
| [A Boolian Algebra With One Constant] (cont.)
| [A Boolian Algebra With One Constant] (cont.)
|
|
|
|
| C.S. Peirce, CP 4.14, untitled paper circa 1880.
| C.S. Peirce, CP 4.14, untitled paper circa 1880.
</pre>
===Note 4===
<pre>
| I have maintained since 1867 that there is but one primary and fundamental
| I have maintained since 1867 that there is but one primary and fundamental
| logical relation, that of illation, expressed by 'ergo'. A proposition,
| logical relation, that of illation, expressed by 'ergo'. A proposition,
|"The Regenerated Logic", 'Monist', vol. 7,
|"The Regenerated Logic", 'Monist', vol. 7,
| pp. 19-40, 1896.
| pp. 19-40, 1896.
</pre>
===Note 5===
<pre>
| Cicero and other ancient writers mention a great dispute between
| Cicero and other ancient writers mention a great dispute between
| two logicians, Diodorus and Philo, in regard to the significance
| two logicians, Diodorus and Philo, in regard to the significance
|"The Regenerated Logic", 'Monist', vol. 7,
|"The Regenerated Logic", 'Monist', vol. 7,
| pp. 19-40, 1896.
| pp. 19-40, 1896.
</pre>
===Note 6===
<pre>
| In order to explain these positions, it is best
| In order to explain these positions, it is best
| to mention that 'possibility' may be understood
| to mention that 'possibility' may be understood
|"The Regenerated Logic", 'Monist', vol. 7,
|"The Regenerated Logic", 'Monist', vol. 7,
| pp. 19-40, 1896.
| pp. 19-40, 1896.
</pre>
===Note 7===
<pre>
| Although the Philonian views lead to such inconveniences as that it
| Although the Philonian views lead to such inconveniences as that it
| is true, as a consequence 'de inesse', that if the Devil were elected
| is true, as a consequence 'de inesse', that if the Devil were elected
|"The Regenerated Logic", 'Monist', vol. 7,
|"The Regenerated Logic", 'Monist', vol. 7,
| pp. 19-40, 1896.
| pp. 19-40, 1896.
</pre>
===Note 8===
<pre>
| The consequence 'de inesse', "if A is true, then B is true",
| The consequence 'de inesse', "if A is true, then B is true",
| is expressed by letting i denote the actual state of things,
| is expressed by letting i denote the actual state of things,
|"The Regenerated Logic", 'The Monist', vol. 7,
|"The Regenerated Logic", 'The Monist', vol. 7,
| pp. 19-40, 1896.
| pp. 19-40, 1896.
</pre>
===Note 9===
<pre>
| The question is what is the sense which is most usefully attached
| The question is what is the sense which is most usefully attached
| to the hypothetical proposition in logic? Now, the peculiarity of
| to the hypothetical proposition in logic? Now, the peculiarity of
|"On the Algebra of Logic: A Contribution to the Philosophy of Notation",
|"On the Algebra of Logic: A Contribution to the Philosophy of Notation",
|'American Journal of Mathematics', vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 180-202, 1885.
|'American Journal of Mathematics', vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 180-202, 1885.
</pre>
===Note 10===
<pre>
| Indexical Dicisigns seem to have no important varieties; but propositions are
| Indexical Dicisigns seem to have no important varieties; but propositions are
| divisible, generally by dichotomy primarily in various ways. In the first place,
| divisible, generally by dichotomy primarily in various ways. In the first place,
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 2.323,
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 2.323,
| from an unpublished "Syllabus", circa 1902.
| from an unpublished "Syllabus", circa 1902.
</pre>
===Note 11===
<pre>
| It remains to show in what manner I suppose the ideas of the other forms
| It remains to show in what manner I suppose the ideas of the other forms
| of propositions to be evolved; and this will be a chapter of what I have
| of propositions to be evolved; and this will be a chapter of what I have
| are one in essence, with some connected matters",
| are one in essence, with some connected matters",
| circa 1895.
| circa 1895.
</pre>
===Note 12===
<pre>
| It must be remembered that
| It must be remembered that
| possibility and necessity
| possibility and necessity
|"The Gamma Part of Existential Graphs",
|"The Gamma Part of Existential Graphs",
|"Lowell Lectures of 1903", Lecture 4.
|"Lowell Lectures of 1903", Lecture 4.
</pre>
===Note 13===
<pre>
| A modal dyadic relation is either a relation between characters
| A modal dyadic relation is either a relation between characters
| (including qualities and relations of individuals, of characters,
| (including qualities and relations of individuals, of characters,
|'A Syllabus of Certain Topics of Logic', intended
|'A Syllabus of Certain Topics of Logic', intended
| as a supplement to the "Lowell Lectures of 1903".
| as a supplement to the "Lowell Lectures of 1903".
</pre>
===Note 14===
<pre>
| Introduction to the Logic of Quantity
| Introduction to the Logic of Quantity
|
|
|"The Logic of Relatives", 'Monist', vol. 7,
|"The Logic of Relatives", 'Monist', vol. 7,
| pp. 161-217, 1897.
| pp. 161-217, 1897.
</pre>
===Note 15===
<pre>
| Introduction to the Logic of Quantity (cont.)
| Introduction to the Logic of Quantity (cont.)
|
|
|"The Logic of Relatives", 'Monist', vol. 7,
|"The Logic of Relatives", 'Monist', vol. 7,
| pp. 161-217, 1897.
| pp. 161-217, 1897.
</pre>
===Note 16===
<pre>
| Introduction to the Logic of Quantity (cont.)
| Introduction to the Logic of Quantity (cont.)
|
|
|"The Logic of Relatives", 'Monist', vol. 7,
|"The Logic of Relatives", 'Monist', vol. 7,
| pp. 161-217, 1897.
| pp. 161-217, 1897.
</pre>
===Note 17===
<pre>
| A few of the most frequently recurring scholastic phrases follow. ...
| A few of the most frequently recurring scholastic phrases follow. ...
|
|
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 2.361, in dictionary entry for "Predication",
| C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 2.361, in dictionary entry for "Predication",
| J.M. Baldwin (ed.), 'Dictionary of Philosophy & Psychology', vol. 2, pp. 326-329.
| J.M. Baldwin (ed.), 'Dictionary of Philosophy & Psychology', vol. 2, pp. 326-329.
</pre>
===Note 18===
<pre>
I need to go back and repair an omission.
I need to go back and repair an omission.
It occurs at the point in CP 3.527 where
It occurs at the point in CP 3.527 where
|"The Logic of Relatives", 'Monist', vol. 7,
|"The Logic of Relatives", 'Monist', vol. 7,
| pp. 161-217, 1897. Marginal note, 1908.
| pp. 161-217, 1897. Marginal note, 1908.
</pre>
===Note 19===
<pre>
| The other divisions of terms, propositions, and arguments
| The other divisions of terms, propositions, and arguments
| arise from the distinction of extension and comprehension.
| arise from the distinction of extension and comprehension.
|'Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences',
|'Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences',
| vol. 7, pp. 287-298, 1867.
| vol. 7, pp. 287-298, 1867.
</pre>
===Note 20===
<pre>
CP 2.418
CP 2.418
<pre>
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
</pre>
</pre>
==HAPA. Hypostatic And Prescisive Abstraction==
==HAPA. Hypostatic And Prescisive Abstraction==
