12,080
edits
Changes
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Sunday April 06, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to searchDirectory:Jon Awbrey/Papers/Inquiry Driven Systems : Part 6 (view source)
Revision as of 02:10, 14 September 2012
, 02:10, 14 September 2012→6.22. Extensional Representations of Sign Relations: markup
Line 3,452:
Line 3,452:
<pre>
<pre>
The next set of Tables summarizes the ERs of A and B. For ease of reference, Tables 48.1 and 49.1 repeat the contents of Tables 1 and 2, respectively, the only difference being that appearances of ordinary quotation marks ("...") are transcribed as invocations of the so called "arch operator" (<...>). The reason for this slight change of notation will be explained shortly. The denotative components Den A and Den B are shown in the first two columns of Tables 48.2 and 49.2, respectively, while the third column gives the transition from sign to object as an ordered pair <s, o>. The connotative components Con A and Con B are shown in the first two columns of Tables 48.3 and 49.3, respectively, while the third column gives the transition from sign to interpretant as an ordered pair <s, i>.
The next set of Tables summarizes the ERs of A and B. For ease of reference, Tables 48.1 and 49.1 repeat the contents of Tables 1 and 2, respectively, the only difference being that appearances of ordinary quotation marks ("...") are transcribed as invocations of the so called "arch operator" (<...>). The reason for this slight change of notation will be explained shortly. The denotative components Den A and Den B are shown in the first two columns of Tables 48.2 and 49.2, respectively, while the third column gives the transition from sign to object as an ordered pair <s, o>. The connotative components Con A and Con B are shown in the first two columns of Tables 48.3 and 49.3, respectively, while the third column gives the transition from sign to interpretant as an ordered pair <s, i>.
+</pre>
+
+<br>
+<pre>
Table 48.1 ER (A): Extensional Representation of A
Table 48.1 ER (A): Extensional Representation of A
Object Sign Interpretant
Object Sign Interpretant
Line 3,463:
Line 3,467:
B <u> <B>
B <u> <B>
B <u> <u>
B <u> <u>
+</pre>
+<br>
+
+<pre>
Table 48.2 ER (Den A): Denotative Component of A
Table 48.2 ER (Den A): Denotative Component of A
Object Sign Transition
Object Sign Transition
Line 3,470:
Line 3,478:
B <B> <<B>, B>
B <B> <<B>, B>
B <u> <<u>, B>
B <u> <<u>, B>
+</pre>
+<br>
+
+<pre>
Table 48.3 ER (Con A): Connotative Component of A
Table 48.3 ER (Con A): Connotative Component of A
Sign Interpretant Transition
Sign Interpretant Transition
Line 3,481:
Line 3,493:
<u> <B> <<u>, <B>>
<u> <B> <<u>, <B>>
<u> <u> <<u>, <u>>
<u> <u> <<u>, <u>>
+</pre>
+<br>
+
+<pre>
Table 49.1 ER (B): Extensional Representation of B
Table 49.1 ER (B): Extensional Representation of B
Object Sign Interpretant
Object Sign Interpretant
Line 3,492:
Line 3,508:
B <i> <B>
B <i> <B>
B <i> <i>
B <i> <i>
+</pre>
+
+<br>
+<pre>
Table 49.2 ER (Den B): Denotative Component of B
Table 49.2 ER (Den B): Denotative Component of B
Object Sign Transition
Object Sign Transition
Line 3,499:
Line 3,519:
B <B> <<B>, B>
B <B> <<B>, B>
B <i> <<i>, B>
B <i> <<i>, B>
+</pre>
+<br>
+
+<pre>
Table 49.3 ER (Con B): Connotative Component of B
Table 49.3 ER (Con B): Connotative Component of B
Sign Interpretant Transition
Sign Interpretant Transition
Line 3,511:
Line 3,535:
<i> <i> <<i>, <i>>
<i> <i> <<i>, <i>>
</pre>
</pre>
+
+<br>
===6.23. Intensional Representations of Sign Relations===
===6.23. Intensional Representations of Sign Relations===
